Jump to content
  • pretty head

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/22 in all areas

  1. (my god PLEASE make this pet bigger this shit is smaller than Extincts brain)
    2 points
  2. Dearest members of titsrp, I want my penis virtuously sucked by my gf. However, she lives across country. This will cover my flight to get turbo sucked 50000. sugartits, yoy donates to BLM please donate to my pp suck
    2 points
  3. Don't forget the neutral leanings that are waiting for other staff to comment before they can form their "own" options.
    2 points
  4. Staff laziness only properly applies to staff not taking sits and talking in OOC when you literally put up 3 sit requests and it hasnt been taken. You as a previous admin should know that Kilo. Literally if your complaint is treating Tene as an equal to OG then lets go to their extents. OG has pushed people off of being staff members and pushed people off the server to the point where no one on the staff team wanted to take his sits out of fear of an appeal or report every time he was punished as he did for me. They didn't want to deal with the headache. Tene, I haven't seen being toxic since I've been back. If he is then it's not being shown to me. He wasn't even that toxic when I was an admin. OGs overall ban history to Tene also isn't something I compare when making decisions as it would be redundant. I make decisions based on the one persons history, personal experience and what they did to get banned in the first place. OG had to get bought back with the buy back being a final chance and he blew it in less than a month of being back. Dude's been permed multiple times. How many perma bans do you need to give a guy before they're done. The contradictory nature of the staff team has always existed. It all is from implicit bias that we get from every decision we do. Being in the players shoes and the defendant in the situation and sometimes being their friend; you're a judge. You're gonna make a fuck up here and there too I dont blame people for that shit too often. But if you're being a fuck face when you were staff previously I'm going to punish you harder than I would a normal player. That's not bias that's looking at their history then making a harsher punishment because they should know what they did wasn't allowed in the first place. For example if you said the N-word in chat I would ban you for a day because you not only were staff but you've been on the server long enough to know damn well you don't say that shit. Being contradictory is giving a random player a bone then another random player doing the same shit with the same attitude a harsher punishment for no apparent reason. Which these are two totally different players with 2 totally different histories with totally different bans and reasons. Tene could have been just permed for exploiting and came back. With OG he had been bought out as a final chance and blew it in less than a month. That's not contradictory that's looking at the situation differently as staff should do.
    1 point
  5. I can absolutely see your frustration when it seems like our staff team feels like lemurs when replying on ban appeals. (Specifically OG Bot) The main issue with me personally is that he was told specifically when he was unbanned with 1 billion darkrp cash that if he was banned for anything again he would remain permanently banned with 0 chance at appeal. Myself personally I find it difficult to fully +1 the appeal when he knew he was thin ice to being gone forever. Whereas the other side of me believes he wasn't as bad as some of our toxic players in the past so he could be a good dude now. I feel like this is a great topic to bring up in a staff meeting and figure out how we can do better as a whole.
    1 point
  6. tldr: no, community shouldn't vote on ban appeals. sugar has final say on exploit bans. two paths of banned, one bad, one good.
    1 point
  7. I could understand your frustration, I didn't vote on the Tene ban appeal because I was super busy with work during all that but I wanted to throw my two cents in here and maybe see things from my perspective. The difference between the Tene appeal and the OG appeal are the actions after the ban was handed down. I think there are 2 very clear paths that each player had paved for themselves after the fact. OG took it a very different and toxic route that fit the personality he has. Tene took the ban and accepted it, moving on from it until the time was right. He wasn't still stirring things up on the forums. OG was still getting forum warns and was caught for alting and on top of that, had the whole fiasco with the unban for $1b. I'm pretty sure when it comes down to ban appeals for exploiting, it is up to Sugar. We all have an opportunity to voice our concerns but Sugar is the only one that should be making final decisions on exploit bans because of the impact it could have caused long term on the server. I disagree with the community having a say on appeals. People have friends. Friends clique up. Friends vote "+1 for unban " without ever seeking to understand the impact of the offence had brought to the server. And I know you know that. We still deal with that even without the community having direct involvement on appeals. Please believe that OG has been talked about in mod/tmod chat and I'm sure the other chats as well where people have shared stories and instances of what his past behaviors were. People are getting information from each other to make a decision based off facts and interactions rather than just going with what everyone else is saying on the appeal. It isn't just a hay day of playing telephone and changing a word or two. I personally don't want to see anyone be perm banned and stay perm banned though I understand why it needs to happen. I know it won't mean much to you or some others on this forum that dislike the decisions I've come to but I promise that during every appeal/report instance, I will make unbiased and fair decisions based off their actions rather than them preaching how much better of a person they are.
    0 points
  8. Incorrect. I state why I -1/+1 ban appeals very clearly and lay out what I see that affected my decision. I spoke to most users in DMs to explain what about their behavior needs to change in order for my decision to change. You guys spamming this video everywhere at every waking moment in support of your friend doesn’t help change my decision. Sorry you feel this way
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...