Jump to content



 Content Type 




DarkRP Server Rules

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Everything posted by Jewann

  1. you did the equivalent of saying "rdm is not allowed" on an appeal of someone banned for rdm. I really don't see how you added useful information.
  2. you said "From what I see this is a proper punishment. Straight from the discord rules." and that is the only thing that was not copy pasted. Which isn't even the question of an appeal, and has no reason to be written. Not even sixnut questions once that his ban was valid, and obviously no staff did. You knew enough about the situation to provide actually useful context, or guidance to staff about the situation leading to the appeal. Instead you just listed rules that staff are already expected to know, and then told an appealing player that he was allowed to stay banned. non staff = should not be reading rules to appealing players as if enforcing them useless = stating something that should already be known by everyone who can comment on the appeal. imo, warn is valid.
  3. It's not that surprising considering it was your 18th ban, also the reason was "extreme racism" so im sure you said some abnormally fucked shit in ooc, Herb definitely wasnt the quickest to perma for something like that. Anyway, this has enough support, and it has been enough time that I am going to accept this appeal. Please do not be racist
  4. Giving verbal warnings does not break staff guidelines. DENIED
  5. OG has a good amount of community support, and also a lot of people simply don't care. Tene having friends on the staff team wile OG doesn't is not a good reason to uphold OG's ban, especially in an absolute sense. Succ's response does a much better job of highlighting the real differences between the two players, and makes a much better argument for why they should be treated differently, although I do not entirely agree with it. While I do think that OG has done enough to warrant his original ban, I do not think he should be treated as unredeemable, especially if what he is saying about not being told ban conditions upon his unban is true. Anyone who has talked to him recently knows that he's a pretty different person from who he once was, and I would be surprised if he had any toxicity issues if he got unbanned. Literally all this guy does now is say the goofiest things, and play rust 25 hours a day.
  6. let us challenge another player to rps and let declining be an auto ban.
  7. could be a cool enchant if not guaranteed. something like "has a 32.44% chance to be inventoried on death". maybe even "has a 32.44% chance to be inventoried on death but 67.56% chance to be immediately inventoried by your killer". would be interesting to see how it affects the market
  8. of course you would have deeper knowledge of the chess area............
  9. Jewann


    Look, I really don't think you would cause any problems as far as toxicity if you were allowed back into the server, and people who have exploited more severely than you have been unbanned, so in that context I am +1 for your unban. However, you have been given many chances in the past, and you knew that your previous ban had the stipulation that if you were banned again, you would be permabanned and you still decided to exploit on an alt. In that context, I do not know if it is fair to say that you deserve to be unbanned. I do not think that you are the entity that needs to be far removed from the server that you once were, but I also cannot say that you undeniably deserve to be allowed back, so I am neutral leaning +1
  10. Jewann

    Koda's Appeal

    This but i am fine with sugar letting you back.
  11. if you have proof of marshal running into the explosion just to die and that you are friends with the other 3, i am +1 for warn removal. otherwise, -1
  12. Jewann

    Secret Santa

    cant wait to get abstergo this year... add me
  13. Personally would have banned you for 3 days. Denied.
  14. It's been a while since I've seen anyone act as disrespectful as you in a sit. You are painting a t-mod on a gmod server as a totalitarian dictator who is silencing dissenters when in reality, he is trying to do his job, and you are making it as hard as possible for him. Instead of having an actual conversation, you just tell him that he is wrong about everything he is telling you (he was wrong about one thing total, and that was to assume NLR applied to terror attacks which is a mistake even many experienced players make). If you want the staff team to treat you with respect, you should treat them with respect, and reasonably bring up your complaints with higher ups rather than putting a t-mod on blast mid-sit, and acting like making a mistake should be the end of him. This report is about how Goat handled this sit, but it was also made by a player who failed to treat a staff member like a human. Goat was already talked to after the ban appeal was accepted, and that is all I believe needs to be done. I will be denying this report at this time. Please try to be respectful of other staff and players in the future. If you can remain level headed, no staff will have an issue assisting you, or even working through their own mistakes with you.
  15. Staff could not provide relevant logs, or valid proof when asked, and warning staff member has since resigned. I am going to be accepting this warn appeal. contact me or any smod+ in-game to have the warn removed.
  16. Jewann


    There's not really a rule against doing this. Unless the warrant was false, or there is evidence that he was profiting off illegal ents, I don't see why he should be warned.
  17. A log could exist of him damaging someone else right before getting shoveled that would explain that he bit the person next to taters, and make the situation more clear. If anyone has logs, they should look for that if possible.
  18. I will be pasting his previous ban appeals below for ease of access to the rest of the staff viewing this appeal. This player is one of only seven people i have blocked on discord, and I was heavily -1 for him to have a chance at appealing at the time of his ban. That said, it has been nearly a year since his ban, he has been a member of the communuty for the past 6 years, and he seems to be taking legitamite steps towards getting his life back together. I am much more willing to give him a chance at this time, and am neutral leaning +1 on this appeal. Here are his previous appeals:
  19. Jewann

    False ban

    You've been banned for over the one day that you should have been banned already. gonna go ahead and accept this.
  20. Jewann

    False ban

    3 days is a bit harsh for this, and ban reasons should definitely be more specific than "failrp". So unless there is something you are not saying, i am +1 for a reduction to 1 day total.
  • Create New...