Jump to content

Recommended Posts

@cobaselic @Byonicin response to your claims that this appeal has no effort

take a look here

 

pretty much the same detail as this appeal… 1 reply and it was accepted, as you basically said this appeal has not enough detail or whatever, this is a good example of picking and choosing….


on the appeal linked above, it was not the banning staff member that accepted it but it took 1 reply to accept it…

 

going also on what is commonly said (which I honestly think is dumb), and as stated by the guy with the Arabic name, “DiDn’T yOu uSeD tO bE sTAfF?” Man was staff a long ass time ago, along with his last ban, a long time ago, 5months is 152 Days, which is almost half a year. But y’all wanna push it to the month because of those reasons…. Holding people to the standards of being ex staff for their existence on titsrp is pretty wrong. Further punishing them because of a former position (which in embers case was a long time ago - 547 days ago roughly) is fucked. It’s like a tie that can’t be broken even though they ARENT that role anymore….

 

as for succs reply, actually no reply to the situation or ban itself but just wanting to extend it because of a reply he didn’t like, also meme’ing “-1 in comic sans” just shows complete disregard for the whole thing but just wants to vote and get involved because of their dislike towards ember

 

it’s not the first time that selective punishment has happened and it certainly will not be the last, staff team moral is whack, people joining band wagons, voting without actually looking into the situation, holding pointless standards against people, pretty tragic but funny to see (in the sense of how basically each appeal goes from certain people always has the same response from you guys)

 

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Thumb Down 3
  • Crybaby 2
3 hours ago, Professional Jay Walker said:

@cobaselic @Byonicin response to your claims that this appeal has no effort

take a look here

 

pretty much the same detail as this appeal… 1 reply and it was accepted, as you basically said this appeal has not enough detail or whatever, this is a good example of picking and choosing….


on the appeal linked above, it was not the banning staff member that accepted it but it took 1 reply to accept it…

 

going also on what is commonly said (which I honestly think is dumb), and as stated by the guy with the Arabic name, “DiDn’T yOu uSeD tO bE sTAfF?” Man was staff a long ass time ago, along with his last ban, a long time ago, 5months is 152 Days, which is almost half a year. But y’all wanna push it to the month because of those reasons…. Holding people to the standards of being ex staff for their existence on titsrp is pretty wrong. Further punishing them because of a former position (which in embers case was a long time ago - 547 days ago roughly) is fucked. It’s like a tie that can’t be broken even though they ARENT that role anymore….

 

as for succs reply, actually no reply to the situation or ban itself but just wanting to extend it because of a reply he didn’t like, also meme’ing “-1 in comic sans” just shows complete disregard for the whole thing but just wants to vote and get involved because of their dislike towards ember

 

it’s not the first time that selective punishment has happened and it certainly will not be the last, staff team moral is whack, people joining band wagons, voting without actually looking into the situation, holding pointless standards against people, pretty tragic but funny to see (in the sense of how basically each appeal goes from certain people always has the same response from you guys)

 

 

 

Bro just got off the hook last month on the grounds that his sit wasnt handled properly. I'm all for fair treatment here but like ember was a dummy for sure to do this. He also could have just spent an extra 5 or so minutes giving a bit more effort. We all know it doesn't hurt and can only help his case.


I cant find context about that appeal which means it was most likely either in admin chat or ingame. Could have been told by the tmod to accept it, or could have been that isaac knew the context to the situation and accepted it due to that. Maybe it was a false ban and they appealed before they were unbanned? Who knows. You know as an ex admin how things be so i dont see why you jumped at isaac about that but if he has the context to clear anything up thatd be cool. (EDIT: isaac2.png)

Ember was supposed to be banned for 2 weeks last time so id say thats fair. From the first section of the punishment guidelines: "If a user has been banned previously within less than a month ago for the same punishment their ban should be increased to a longer length, there can be exceptions for serious cases.'

I wouldn't call this a serious case. A serious case would be someone with no intention to be a community member, however I also dont think it should just be a week, which is why i find two weeks to be fair.


 

Edited by Blue.
3 hours ago, Professional Jay Walker said:

@cobaselic @Byonicin response to your claims that this appeal has no effort

take a look here

 

pretty much the same detail as this appeal… 1 reply and it was accepted, as you basically said this appeal has not enough detail or whatever, this is a good example of picking and choosing….


on the appeal linked above, it was not the banning staff member that accepted it but it took 1 reply to accept it…

 

going also on what is commonly said (which I honestly think is dumb), and as stated by the guy with the Arabic name, “DiDn’T yOu uSeD tO bE sTAfF?” Man was staff a long ass time ago, along with his last ban, a long time ago, 5months is 152 Days, which is almost half a year. But y’all wanna push it to the month because of those reasons…. Holding people to the standards of being ex staff for their existence on titsrp is pretty wrong. Further punishing them because of a former position (which in embers case was a long time ago - 547 days ago roughly) is fucked. It’s like a tie that can’t be broken even though they ARENT that role anymore….

 

as for succs reply, actually no reply to the situation or ban itself but just wanting to extend it because of a reply he didn’t like, also meme’ing “-1 in comic sans” just shows complete disregard for the whole thing but just wants to vote and get involved because of their dislike towards ember

 

it’s not the first time that selective punishment has happened and it certainly will not be the last, staff team moral is whack, people joining band wagons, voting without actually looking into the situation, holding pointless standards against people, pretty tragic but funny to see (in the sense of how basically each appeal goes from certain people always has the same response from you guys)

 

 

 

Sir before you jump to conclusions maybe you should get all the facts.. that appeal was accepted because the banning staff member made the wrong call. Dudes history wasn’t bad and I had him unbanned . Ember is not new he knows what’s allowed and not 

  • Thumb Down 1
1 hour ago, {GN} Isaac said:

Sir before you jump to conclusions maybe you should get all the facts.. that appeal was accepted because the banning staff member made the wrong call. Dudes history wasn’t bad and I had him unbanned . Ember is not new he knows what’s allowed and not 

I had stated that the appeal was accepted with “minimal detail”, not the context of the ban, not the actual reason for his appeal, but specifically for the amount of effort put into it, where was his “THIS HAS NO DETAIL ON AN APPEAL YOU SHOULD PUT DETAIL” 

 

but no, cause the guy isn’t as known as ember, and isn’t former staff, isn’t held on standard standards, he was fine to go with no questions asked, as I said “Selective punishment” 

 

That guy wasn’t questioned about detail

Ember was

why? Let me tell you… oh wait I have in my lengthy reply previously

 

You brushed past everything else I said and just looked at the “that dudes history wasn’t bad” ok lol?  Disregard everything I’d said about selective punishment and how it’s the same shit on everyone’s appeal that’s on the same stature as ember, all the band wagon reply, the UNSERIOUS and BIAS reply clearly from succ, which a lot of people will have seen and if a potential edit were to happen then we know exactly how shit works…

 

The way appeals work lately, for months on end have been the same thing 

first reply “im +1 because “extremely valid point here”

all the following replies (or most of them)

1. im +1 cause *staff member said what I was gonna say*
2. Im +1 (no reason given)

3. Shit post replies “this makes me want to +1 to extend (-1 in comic sans)”

 

dog shit moral, coordination, team work and originality lol

  • Like 4
  • Blue. unlocked this topic
On 9/18/2022 at 11:34 AM, Ember said:

and also a nigga just wants to play gmod to be fair because I want to Mass RDM Bruhther. I have served 11 days of my month ban

This here was enough for me to go 

-1 This Should Already Be Denied Purely Because It Was A TERRIBLE Appeal Just Because Of That This Is Wrote In Comic Sans

  • crine 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumb Down 5
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...