Jump to content

Tyz37

Moderator

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Calendar

DarkRP Server Rules

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Everything posted by Tyz37

  1. I am going to say that the ban is overdone on this. The correct ban time is 3 days instead for one week. I say +1 for a reduction but not for a full ban removal.
  2. I will ping someone to do it for me. I have not been on lately. Sorry about that.
  3. You were banned for mass NLR. This was due to the fact that you were inside the doors of the base each time (3 times to be exact). It was not a ban for you calling me "hella shit", it was because you broke NLR 3 times which constituted mass NLR. Additionally, Malicious called a sit on you for breaking the NLR after you called a sit on him for RDM. I never "came at you sideways". I asked both sides what was going on, spectated positions, and then was dealing with punishments as they should be dished out. I have not "lost" my staff way. You were not in front of the doorway, you were inside the door of the base. I do not appreciate the lying in your appeal. I genuinely don't give a shit what I am called but you calling me names during a sit is uncalled for especially when i am trying to sort stuff out. The following are some of the logs: Chat Logs: Player SSOT(STEAM_0:1:174396950) (Batman) said !pm F51Farsonal goofy warning me for MNLR <19-12-2021 / 15:28:20> Warn (e menu version) Logs: SSOT (STEAM_0:1:174396950) (Batman) warned Tyz37 (STEAM_0:1:42745682) (Weapon Modifier) to get away from them <19-12-2021 / 15:27:04> Death Logs: Player Malicious ( ) (STEAM_0:0:178115266) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon tfcss_m4a1_acog <19-12-2021 / 15:17:13> Player Malicious ( ) (STEAM_0:0:178115266) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon tfcss_m4a1_acog <19-12-2021 / 15:15:08> Player Malicious ( ) (STEAM_0:0:178115266) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon weapon_handcannon <19-12-2021 / 15:14:34> Player Jo Bama (Bank Heister) (STEAM_0:0:139566523) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon Player [40][Jo Bama] <19-12-2021 / 15:11:41> Player Malicious ( ) (STEAM_0:0:178115266) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon weapon_handcannon <19-12-2021 / 15:11:08> Player SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) killed Jo Bama (Bank Heister) (STEAM_0:0:139566523) with weapon weapon_ccminigun3 <19-12-2021 / 15:08:26> Player SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) killed gay porn guy (bloods #1 opp killa) (STEAM_0:0:624814845) with weapon weapon_ccminigun3 <19-12-2021 / 15:05:29> Player SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) killed Tyz37 (Spirit Caller) (STEAM_0:1:42745682) with weapon weapon_ccminigun3 <19-12-2021 / 15:02:54> Player gay porn guy (bloods #1 opp killa) (STEAM_0:0:624814845) killed SSOT (Batman) (STEAM_0:1:174396950) with weapon weapon_peacemaker <19-12-2021 / 14:52:24> I am Neutral. I want more opinions before I make my call on this. I am changing my opinion to a -1 as well. I originally did not see an issue with the ban time. Since other staff agree that it is fine, I am going to leave the ban time as is unless other staff come forward to give a +1 to the appeal.
  4. Tyz37

    Ban Appeal

    I am going to Accept the appeal for a REDUCTION on the ban length. The Ban length will be changed to 2 Weeks instead of 1 month. If you give DDOS threats again though then I will not be reducing the sentence of the ban. Ban has been requested to be reduced to 2 Weeks.
  5. Tyz37

    Ban Appeal

    As the banning moderator, I am neutral on what to do for this. You threatened to DDOS someone which is absolutely uncalled for. You were cuffed and fined and the response was a DDOS threat. I would like to see what the rest of the mods+ think about reducing the time as it is the correct ban length and punishment. Neutral for now.
  6. Looks like NLR to me. I will say +1 to add a punishment for it.
  7. correct. you need a warrant to enter that base at that point. it is a failrp for raiding without a warrant and i forgot to add that to the warn reason. the only issue with the warn at all is that i forgot to add that.
  8. You were already warned verbally within the last 24 hours for a false fining instance. If you were already verbally warned, the punishment becomes a warn or ban. Your record is not clean as you have two prior verbal warns if I am not mistaken. You fined for jaywalking in this log. 22:27:47 Officer Haze_of_dream fined vapidtex (Bubbas Shrimpn Boat) for Bounty, JW. The jaywalking was never done. I saw video evidence that the guy never jaywalked and his bounty was only $500. The fine you gave was $5000. That is a false fine in regards to the jaywalking in it. Additionally, I mistakenly did not add that you raided without a warrant in the warn reason too so that is the only issue with the sit overall. I am going to say -1 for the appeal due to it being valid. The clip attached is the clip that was shown to me as evidence for the sit. Once it is done processing it will be up.
  9. Tyz37

    Silver's Appeal

    Even players who are not staff who have seen the ban appeal know how toxic you are in game. You have even made some of them almost quit the server entirely. You have constantly been hanging by a thread for your actions and now something has been done about it. Your attitude in game is just terrible half the time. I dont believe that just because rhe new update will drop that that should be the reason you are allowed back. I am going to say -1 for the appeal.
  10. So the reason you were banned was for being untargetable through just about every command I tried using. I tried bringing you to a sit, freezing you, jailtp’ing you, etc and none of them were working. I never said “just leave the game”. I really said for you to leave and rejoin to try to fix it and you refused. I was told by admin/superadmin to ask how you made yourself untargetable and you then said you were not going to tell me. You were being highly uncooperative and when sits were called on you i was not able to do basically anything about it. You completely left out where you had been asked about how you did it and refused to say even if it was a bug, you refused to cooperate in the sits, and the higher ups had told me that that was the proper ban reason and time for you making yourself untargetable (with 99% of the commands that were tried). If you had been honest and said you didn’t know how it happened instead of trying to be a tough guy this would not have happened. If you listened and did what I was told to tell you to do to see if it would reset the steam if then the issue may have been avoided. In conclusion, it appeared as though you were doing something to manipulate your steamid to avoid being targeted by commands so you could break rules. You were uncooperative during the sit and acted like you knew what was going on but would not say. That is the reason you were banned. For the reason of trying to avoid punishment for rule breaking through manipulation of the steamid. I am NEUTRAL leaning towards -1 to this appeal as you left out details. I am normally for second chances but leaving out the important details to make me look bad is not appreciated at all.
  11. I am going to say -1 for the unban due to the ban being just for the RDM's due to crossfire. You don't seem to have any intention to RP.
  12. I am trying to check through logs right now to figure out which video it was (like the youtube link) but each link I try comes up with the same result of "this video has been removed by the uploader". The only thing that seems odd to me is how you say "jerk off circle in theater" and then that video plays a bit later after a while. I can post logs here if you want but I remember checking the video and it was only about 9 seconds (theater skips 4-8 seconds at the beginning of each video to load it for a player). I do not remember whether I got there once it had already started playing or whether I got there after. I do remember people saying that they saw a dick in theater and that lucy said she was "flashed". I checked logs to find what video it was (if I am not mistaken it should have been the second one down in logs) and then once obtaining the video I brought you to the sit and discussed the issue. The main concern I have is that there were like 11 people in theater. It was a BIG crowd for that theater. If someone was asked to skip it it was lucy who was asked. I am contacting admin to see what they say involving the logs (will include isaac since he has responded to this post).
  13. I am going to be neutral about this. I will leave the choice up to the other staff but the ban is correct for the offense. Forwarding to others now for a reply.
  14. What about a job that can use an entity like a "Trash Recycling Machine" or something and recycle the trash? It could use trash and turn it into xp or potentially a crafting material (as a rare chance for it to turn into the material). Just a thought.
  15. Alright, here is my input on the situation. I just replied to the other topic that was the report on toosii for the exact same instance. I am going to quote myself here so I do not have to retype the exact same thing again. "In my opinion, it was a clear RDM. As per the rules RDM is any unjustified killing of a player. I am stating this cause it is differentiated from IRDM which is INTENTIONAL RDM. That being said RDM can be an accidental kill such as a crossfire. I had not trouble watching the clips a few times each to get an idea on what exactly happened and to formulate what I believe should be done. My verdict on the situation is this, the sit itself was handled poorly but additionally the attitude towards "SHORESTONE!" was also very poor. He was just reporting an RDM that happened to him. I don't see why you are being toxic and hostile to him calling him an idiot. I get why you called toosii an idiot as he was handling the issue against you poorly. The toxicity in the sit is the main issue I have with it. I say a warn of some kind is justified in this instance whether it be a verbal or a real warn. The poor handling of the sit is what I am going to place the verdict on though. The poor handling is grounds for him to be talked to about it. If need be I will definitely be talking to him about how he handles his sits and how it could have been executed better. " That being taken care of, The kill was indeed RDM. The attitude was poor during the sit. I get how it can be frustrating to have a sit that is handled poorly. Even though it is frustrating, keeping the name calling down during the sit would have gotten you a lot farther than the berating and name calling that went down. It was RDM so I am going to say -1 for a full warn removal but if the others agree to change it to a verbal I am alright with that as it still is within the punishment guidelines to give a verbal for such an instance.
  16. In my opinion, it was a clear RDM. As per the rules RDM is any unjustified killing of a player. I am stating this cause it is differentiated from IRDM which is INTENTIONAL RDM. That being said RDM can be an accidental kill such as a crossfire. I had not trouble watching the clips a few times each to get an idea on what exactly happened and to formulate what I believe should be done. My verdict on the situation is this, the sit itself was handled poorly but additionally the attitude towards "SHORESTONE!" was also very poor. He was just reporting an RDM that happened to him. I don't see why you are being toxic and hostile to him calling him an idiot. I get why you called toosii an idiot as he was handling the issue against you poorly. The toxicity in the sit is the main issue I have with it. I say a warn of some kind is justified in this instance whether it be a verbal or a real warn. The poor handling of the sit is what I am going to place the verdict on though. The poor handling is grounds for him to be talked to about it. If need be I will definitely be talking to him about how he handles his sits and how it could have been executed better. In conclusion, I do not believe toosii should be punished but he does need a talking to about his sit technique. The sit was not handled well and could have been handled way better. For punishment such as demotion I am a -1 but for talking him over what could be done better and making sure he knows how to handles sits a bit better it is a +1 as him getting talked to/reprimanded for his poor execution of the sit.
  17. You new what you were doing and I had said in game chat to stop the second time you came back. You started coming back the third time and that is when I warned you in pm that if you broke mass NLR I would punish you. You kept coming back and grenading the building, broke your raid timer to do it (we even had to go out back to get rid of the c4 you placed one of the times which I only counted as FailRP instead of a 4th NLR, and you killed many people other than just Lucy and I. We have had these discussions before. You keep going above and beyond to cause an issue and the only way I am allowed to deal with it is by enforcing the rules manually such as bans and warns. I have been told that by Smods and up before. I am dealing with it how I was told to deal with it. People (who were chilling there) asked if I was going to do something about it at that point and they were even saying that it was becoming an issue. I am neutral on this appeal. Waiting for other staff to respond.
  18. I am going to say -1 for now. I would personally have given a verbal as you have no previous warns in the last 2 years for RDM. It is RDM though and the warn is proper as one of the punishments. That is why I am giving a -1 for the appeal.
  19. I am neutral on this as there is only one issue I have with the evidence. I cant see what happened a bit before. I am not doubting any player here but i need a full list of the evidence or at least a video that shows what happened before and what the player did wrong once the original event transpired. Due to this I am neutral for now.
  20. Neutral as well. Same thing that has been summed up already by koda.
  21. I would like to see the damage logs if possible before fully making a decision but it does look like mass rdm without them.
  22. Gerbs summed it all up for me as well. There doesn't seem to be any real sincerity and in addition you decided to not take responsibility and admit to fucking up. "I was sleepy"? That is a poor excuse for that. If you would have taken responsibility then it would have been a +1 but since you refused to even do that and blame it on being "sleepy" I absolutely will not give a +1 for this. Nobody in their right mind who is in any way normal would want to see that kind of thing that you had sent in the chat and you basically tricked people through reverse psychology into checking it out. In summary -1 for the unban for me due to lack of sincerity, no responsibility for your actions, and for sending something so vile in chat.
  23. I would also like to see the video before I put up my opinion. You can upload it to youtube if you would like or one of the other sites that are similar.
  24. Tyz37

    Banned for MRDM

    You said you were raiding a base and you were really at fountain. That is not a base.
  25. Tyz37

    Banned for MRDM

    You said you were raiding and in reality you were by fountain killing a bunch of people. You cant raid fountain.
×
×
  • Create New...
tits.gg