Jump to content

stupid dumb bans (garbo staff omg !!!)


dyln2000
 Share

Recommended Posts

In-Game Name

dyln (NOT DYLN2000, IT IS AN IMPOSTOR)

Your Steam ID

STEAM_0:0:176956777

Why were you banned or warned?

There are 2 false bans on my record, let me explain!!!
I was in a sit with Frisco and SexyBatman for RDM, when the sit ended Brisky warned me for racism. I got banned for hitting 15 warns. Brisky told me to log back on, I was unbanned and the racism warn was removed (mistype, i think) Anyways, Frisco warned me for the RDM. I got banned for hitting 15 warns. This means I have 2 bans on my profile for the same thing. Please remove one of the bans.
2nd ban, TAYKAY47 banned me for MRDM and it was because the wrong steamID was copied. I was unbanned instantly.

Why should you be unwarned/unbanned?

I would like the number to go down, as both of these bans are false. I was not racist, and I did not MRDM.

Who warned/banned you?

Console for 15 warns, and TAYKAY47 for the MRDM

How long were you warned or banned for?

null

These staff members are not to be punished. They were both honest mistakes and I simply want the bans off of my profile.

  • Like 1
  • thumbdown -1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aight so personally if it was on a different day or if it made any difference in times for like a verified stamp or something I'd understand.

 

Personally looking at this I'd actually rather it stay. It shows that you constantly break rules to a degree. And the other bans after and before that show that as well. From a staffing standpoint I don't see why we should remove it. 

 

+1 Changed due to me being a dipshit and reading the appeal wrong. 

Edited by Succ The Zucc
Being a dipshit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It shows that you constantly break rules to a degree."

These bans are complete accidents and are NOT valid punishments, given that the warn for racism was a mistype, and the ban for MRDM was also incorrect. Why should there be a ban on my record for a mistyped steamID? Why are there 2 bans on my record for hitting 15 warnings, even though it should've been only 1? Your reasoning is flawed.

 

My valid bans demonstrate my infractions. These do not, and thinking otherwise is not only ignorant, but your view on this is foolish and your critical thinking is minuscule at best.

 

This is not a matter of "voting to decide," these bans were obviously false. If you ask the staff members involved, you will know instantly that these were honest mistakes and have no place on my profile, demonstrating FALSE punishments.

 

From a staffing standpoint, I don't see why you have any place deciding whether or not my false bans should be removed. This is simply a matter of attempting to reach out to one of the superadmins. They have done it before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the same situation as the post Silver had made just hours ago, he wants his false bans removed and so do I. You instantly +1 it for no reason other than "Why not," then you -1 this one for the same exact reason. This only further proves your biases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay relooking at what you're saying and I apologize for getting confused on your wording in the appeal. I read as Frisco and Brisky were the 2 bans and the way you said it seem like 2 totally different scenarios. That's on me. I'll switch it to a plus after reviewing it again literally the bans menu glitches and doesn't put unbans sometimes and other times it does. So I read Taykays ban as a legit ban. 

 

But in the future m8 please try to not be rude about a simple mistake. Just come out saying I read the appeal wrong. Lol I was fucking confused for a minute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dyln said:

This is not a matter of "voting to decide," these bans were obviously false. If you ask the staff members involved, you will know instantly that these were honest mistakes and have no place on my profile, demonstrating FALSE punishments.

 

From a staffing standpoint, I don't see why you have any place deciding whether or not my false bans should be removed. This is simply a matter of attempting to reach out to one of the superadmins. They have done it before.

because the more we let this happen the more posts we get for 'please remove my false ban!!'. I'm not sure why you even want it removed. To make your record look clean? You already have a reputation on the server for your sit calling among other things, and any staff member or user who looks at your bans can very clearly see what happened and that you were unbanned. If you are going for verified then sure, but you still got banned for the same thing an hour later so its not like the time to expire for verified requirements is any different, aside from verified, the only other thing would be because 'it makes u look bad' whenever someone $info's you, which it doesnt, because no one cares.
Yes superadmins have done it before, but should it really be a daily occurence that they have to go and remove someones ban because it makes their profile look slightly worse? I really don't care what happens with this appeal specifically, but if a superadmin does accept it then there will most definitely be floods of these types of appeals for things that really just don't matter, which not only will make forums look icky(er than it already is) will also make rubik or sugar's time even more wasted than them pushing out kings portal update and not making the portal function............. @Sugar Tits

+1 because the bans were indeed false
-1 because it's just going to lead to more of these appeals when they really don't matter

(this means neutral...)

Edited by Tene
aaa
  • Angry -1 2
  • thumbdown -1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the warn was removed then the ban for the “15 warn limit” is not important. It is not really looked at at all because it has no context so that one is not an important one. +1 for that one.

 

The other warn being false would be a valid one to have removed. I know super admin want evidence though when removing bans from records if I am not mistaken. Overall I would be a +1 to have that one removed but this is a thing only super admin can do.

 

My only issue with it is that having ones that are not important appealed (such as warn limits ones) is just time consuming and unneccessary on general.

  • crybaby -1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Mod on LOA here)

 

I was in the sit when TayTay accidentally banned dyln for MRDM, he was meant to ban other user but hes dum and accidentally banned dyln!!!!!!!

 

And i do agree that it is not fair that Dyln should have 2 "Hitting 15 warns" bans, when the accidental racism warn that dyln got banned for is still on her record and bri forgot to take it out.

 

+1 for them bans being taken out of her record

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...