Leaderboard

no more jokes no more insults no more anything disable ooc.

Open discussion, please don't argue! Something I've noticed on the server is that zoophile jokes & accusations aren't taken as seriously as jokes/accusations related to pedophilia. Joking about pedophilia or accusing other people of being pedophiles without proof is a bannable offense obviously, for a good reason. But regarding zoophilia, I've lost count of the amount of times I've been told that I fuck dogs, want to fuck dogs, or have been told to go fuck dogs or just be outright called a zoophile because I'm a furry. It's relatively discomforting to immediately receive that label simply because of, I dunno how to word it- identification stuff, I guess. There's people out there that automatically link being a furry to being a zoophile, but that's a whole different discussion. I'm not trying to play the victim card here but it's very uncomfortable being called a dog fucker/zoophile all the time by toxic retards. I feel like in regards to ethics and morality zoophilia and pedophilia are on the same par of things in regarding to being downright horrible and heinous, so why aren't false zoophile accusations taken as seriously as false pedo accusations? It's made me wonder- should false zoophile accusations be taken as seriously as false pedophile accusations in the sense that they're bannable? Personally I could care less about generic, retarded furry insults, but being called a zoophile/dog fucker is the only thing that genuinely makes me uncomfortable. Just wondering. I've also attached some images of someone calling me a dog fucker literally today, like twenty minutes ago so that people know I'm not some deranged schizo.