Jump to content

Sticks Ban Appeal


Sticks
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Smelly said:

All the proof about you has been presented before you and the only thing you can offer us is mixed stories that change to each piece of evidence posted. How about you provide some proof of ANYTHING you are saying. You can sit here and say "I would have saved my shadowplay" until you are blue in the face but you were in a Discord call with Sticks, you knew he got banned, and you still saved nothing. He knew what he was getting banned for, he knew the evidence against him before this thread was even mad and you both can still provide not a sliver of evidence and are trying to sway the decision based off statements with no facts behind them.

If my shadowplay only captures the past 5 minutes and Im not called into a sit until 10 minutes after the situation happened, how do you expect me to provide proof?
 

 

5 minutes ago, Smelly said:

l the proof about you has been presented before you and the only thing you can offer us is mixed stories that change to each piece of evidence posted.

This entire thread everytime it has been asked why a hit was placed on him we have said the same thing, we dont like him and we wanted to play poker with low instead. I'm not sure where our stories are changing.

 

The money has already been offered back to Special twice now, once he was offered 5x what he lost, but he still hasn’t even responded to it despite posting twice since the first offer. He obviously doesn’t care about the money and just gets off on seeing people get in trouble. 

Edited by Sticks
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the principal of the thing Sticks. I was excited to get to play poker, win or lose, because I enjoy the game. And I agree with Maze that it seems more like buying your way out of punishment more than anything else.

 

And honestly, I wasn't entirely really even upset at first, but then in the sit when you got agitated that I had proof of the situation and started telling me how easy it would've been to get back in time before timing out and that "you knew I wouldn't have the skills to get back in time because I'm not as much of a gamer as you" and that "you're much better than me in every regard" just made lose sympathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Special Educator said:

 agitated that I had proof of the situation

I was never agitated about proof of anything, I was agitated by the way that Smelly was speaking to me. 

9 minutes ago, Special Educator said:

I agree with Maze that it seems more like buying your way out of punishment more than anything else.

I wouldnt call it buying my way out of punishment, I would say its more so restitution, where me giving you the money would be the punishment. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jewann said:

well im a bit late but i have a few things to say

 

1) no rules were explicitly broken

 

2) some of the things put in the ban reason don't apply (exploiting???)

 

3) 1 week seems like an absurdly long amount of time for at most a single rdm (but it wasnt even that)

Killing someone so their bet times out and they cannot win sounds like exploiting server systems to me. 
 

The week ban was a ban to get him off the server and discuss further. I brought it up in Mod chat on discord because I was the only one online. The full ban reason is “FailRP / Minging / Exploiting / Toxicity (Will discuss further with staff)”.

Edited by Smelly
  • thumbdown -1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that this shouldn't be allowed to do in the server, because it can happen stuff like this, someone is gambling with PPL, and has a fuck ton of money at stake, then someone who is ready to loose, calls a hit on a player who is gambling, they kill him and then they loose all the money they have gambled just because of someone that to decided to fuck them over, so this pretty much sounds like Exploiting and Loopholing to me. But i believe that part of the responsability has to lie on whoever called the hit, but then whoever went through the hit isn't innocent either because they knowingly knew what were they trying to achieve by going through the hit request.

 

-1 for the user being unbanned NEUTRAL for the player who called the hit to be slapped in the wrist

Edited by ¡TzFurry!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ¡TzFurry! said:

I believe that this shouldn't be allowed to do in the server, because it can happen stuff like this, someone is gambling with PPL, and has a fuck ton of money at stake, then someone who is ready to loose, calls a hit on a player who is gambling, they kill him and then they loose all the money they have gambled just because of someone that to decided to fuck them over, so this pretty much sounds like Exploiting and Loopholing to me. But i believe the responsability has to lie on whoever called the hit.

 

-1 for the user being unbanned

You're contradicting yourself in your own post. You say the responsibility should lie on whoever called the hit but you say I should stay banned? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sticks said:

You're contradicting yourself in your own post. You say the responsibility should lie on whoever called the hit but you say I should stay banned? 

I am sorry, edited my input accordingly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are not involved in this situation or not staff. Don't reply or you will be warned. Do not make this thread 20 pages long. Do not have a conversations in this thread. Post your evidence, let staff reply. 

 

Take it to discord 

Edited by {GN} Isaac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk why would you call a hit on someone while gambling.. That definitely should not be allowed and maybe a new rule we should add.  I completely agree with smelly here I feel there was some foul play here. I feel Sticks knew what he was doing he is a long time player. Sticks knows how to play the system and get away with current things.  But also  don't feel there is not enough evidence to prove that Sadly.. 


 


 

 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...