Jump to content

Sticks Ban Appeal


Sticks
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't know why this would be a 1 week ban, like Jewann said this wasn't even rdm, someone wanted to place a hit, Sticks accepted the hit, and killed special educator.  I don't see how that would be exactly punishable by a ban or even a warn.  I'm also going to put this quote from extremely trustworthy ex Sr Mod (almost practically Admin) Jack Johnson "But you see, you cant just assume they know what they did. It has to be a fact, a yes or a no. If its not a fact, you cant ban him" (Talking about loop holing and exploiting).  Also aren't you suppose to discuss before banning a person... +1 for unban 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They knew what they did, that's why they said 'he's going to time out' as I was on the ground. And then Sticks said thank you for the money so fast after he killed me, because he knew that I had no way to get back to the table.

 

And when I came back and said this seemed like a scam Sticks said I don't give a fuck

Edited by Special Educator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, SCP 343 said:

this didnt happen btw

May I ask what you claim didn't happen? Smerexy, who was in the same call and on the same table saying immediately "He's going to time out" proving they were aware of that feature?

 

Or Sticks responding I don't care when I said this seemed like a scam?

  • crybaby -1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SCP 343 said:

it didnt happen you are lying

Here is proof of my claims. And I think this can definitely be used as evidence they knew what they were doing. Please review and tell me how I'm lying SCP 343.

 

Clip 1: Proof of Smerexy saying that "hes gonna time out" proving that they were aware of how the timeout works if someone physically can't get back to the table in time.

 

Clip 2: As soon as I get back Sticks starts going "trololololol" showing he knew exactly what it was he was doing and even if he wasn't doing it for the money, was trying to "troll" me, and this was clearly something he knew what he was doing. If he didn't know exactly what he was doing why would he be singing trololol if this was simply an rp situation?

 

Clip 3: (Apologies for the audio, someone was spamming music but listening you can hear me ask. My proof that I said this seems like a scam and Sticks saying "I don't fucking care" He did it first in voice, but I couldn't really hear so he kindly reiterated in chat

 

Please tell me how I'm lying SCP 343.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Minky said:

I wouldn't know why this would be a 1 week ban, like Jewann said this wasn't even rdm, someone wanted to place a hit, Sticks accepted the hit, and killed special educator.  I don't see how that would be exactly punishable by a ban or even a warn.  I'm also going to put this quote from extremely trustworthy ex Sr Mod (almost practically Admin) Jack Johnson "But you see, you cant just assume they know what they did. It has to be a fact, a yes or a no. If its not a fact, you cant ban him" (Talking about loop holing and exploiting).  Also aren't you suppose to discuss before banning a person... +1 for unban 

Minky said it and I agree so I'm a +1 for unban 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

17 minutes ago, Jason Bourne said:

But you see, you cant just assume they know what they did. It has to be a fact, a yes or a no. If its not a fact, you cant ban him

 

Just out of genuine curiosity, why are we stuck on the idea they didn't know this would happen? They knew that all they had to do was raise the pot higher and higher, then place a hit on me to take the money from me. I feel my evidence supports that, especially the fact that Sticks  20 seconds after killing me said "Thanks for the money." Are we saying that alone doesn't show he clearly knew what he was doing, that making me put in lots of money then killing me wasn't his plan? If this was just to get me off the table, why make that comment?

Then if you put on top of that the fact that when he saw me come back, he was singing "trolololol" at me, that just compounds the fact that he DID know exactly what he was doing, and is just being a dick about it. 

 

 

If I'm off base here, please someone do tell me, because I just don't understand how what I;ve shown doesn't prove these three experienced players knew exactly how this worked and what they were doing.

Edited by Special Educator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Thanks for the money" 20 seconds after killing me. Shows that the money I lost was immediately on their mind. Why would he say this if he wasn't killing me for money?

 

And even if the money meant nothing to them, they still did what they did to make me lose my money. If they truly ONLY wanted to have me get up from the table, they could have waited until the hand was over, or asked me to get up. But instead they exploited the system where you can just force a player out of a hand whenever you'd like and take their money they bet

Edited by Special Educator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Special Educator said:

"Thanks for the money" 20 seconds after killing me. Shows that the money I lost was immediately on their mind. Why would he say this if he wasn't killing me for money?

 

And even if the money meant nothing to them, they still did what they did to make me lose my money. If they truly ONLY wanted to have me get up from the table, they could have waited until the hand was over, or asked me to get up. But instead they exploited the system where you can just force a player out of a hand whenever you'd like and take their money they bet

That is not enough proof to show he did it just to keep you from winning. 

Edited by Jason Bourne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...