Jump to content
  • pretty head

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/22/24 in all areas

  1. Ima be real we everyone knew the answers to those questions and we need to step back and look at the them as a whole not just because they raid you or a sit didn't go your way. What really needa to be looked at is, is this staff member taking sits? Are the responsive with questions? Do they care about the wellbeing of the server? Have they been replying to new staff apps and accepting them when appropriate along with training them? It's no secret that people don't necessarily like a few of the staff members, but why? In all of my time snooping the forums and honestly being back I haven't really seen any good reasons as to why they aren't liked. The only reasons I've seen are them raiding people which is obviously gonna make anyone mad. That's part of the game though? I can understand needing to make sure controversial staff members try to mend their reputation as to not cause anymore drama but making an anonymous post with a very vague answer isn't the way to approach it. Give good long thought out reasons otherwise things probably won't change.
    2 points
  2. https://imgur.com/a/dDWV1or https://imgur.com/a/NCnfsxN I don't know how to format so this is the best I got for now
    2 points
  3. Hi all, going to release a second version to those I know won't bullshit so do your best to just be down to earth and honest, thanks! https://forms.gle/ZCgJMtsD8HnV2Cgb6 EDIT : IF I SENT YOU THE PRIVATE ONE IGNORE THAT IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY DONE IT AND DO THE PUBLIC ONE Don't want to have any duplicate responses if/when i merge the two
    1 point
  4. Yeah I just can't find away to do it right now without leaking my legal name and have the responses update at the same time. I am about to release some more stuff about the results so far though. The admin/smod questions are kind of obvious how they'd be answered but I'm sure people are curious, would really like some more responses, only 30 on the main for so far.
    1 point
  5. July 22nd Changelog Investments in the bank will increase 5% every 5 minutes but will depreciate exponentially if no manager is active Money Launderer NPC will spawn in a random location each day Robbing the bank will alert the police and add a bounty Bank Insurance costs $10k but will guarantee all investments under $150k unless hacked Bank manager gets a cut of insurance purchases Slightly reduced the time that the bank stays open when robbing it Increased the players needed to rob a bank by 5 and police by 1 Fixed the bank C4 missing a model Reduced the cereal needed to summon a train from 75 --> 40 Prevent spawning of gun shelves in safe zones Fixed being able to use/drop an item while dead Fixed a bug where you couldn't stack mini printers Improved FPS when drawing a large number of mini printers Fixed boombox playback (for now) and updated color scheme Fixed a rare bug when trading that could cause inventory desync if you were using the search option Fixed 'xp on join' perk for supporters. You might need to toggle it on again Fixed hackers not getting money from hacked printers Made it so you can hack printer racks to print or reroute money from all printers Mod+ can refund their own items if they are RDMed Improved the UI of xban When running !shownlr, pressing space will remove the UI. Using arrows will no longer teleport you (use R instead)
    1 point
  6. People who make google forms can see who sends answers. I will not be sending in an answer for this reason.
    1 point
  7. you being less active doesnt mean that the server is dying. the server has actually been popping a lot more as far as i know and is quite fun. as for ur survey some of the statements are incredibly weirdly phrased. ''do you think you should have to wait ur turn to raid". I personally wish it didnt have to be like this, but YOU and YOUR GROUP specifically abusing this to ''takeover raid'' and then ''accidently die to my own timebomb'' or ''accidently walked into their bullets'' are the entire reason this rule was put in place. If taking over raids could be added without any form of counter raid takeovers then i'd be down, but unfortunately your group heavily abused this so it had to be lost to prevent that. as for the raid district question it seems to be written as if you didnt understand the current rule. why would we ban ''problematic people'' if there is no sufficient evidence put against them? if this were the case we would permanently ban terry, not because of any rulebreaks, but because he raids people too much. See how ridiculous it is to ban ''problematic people'' without an air tight case? So many people want terry banned BECAUSE he raids them, not because he is a supervillain who breaks every single rule, and if we just listened to them we'd be banning a player for doing nothing wrong and literally just being good at an aspect of the server (raiding). As for the 2nd half, not sure what you mean and i would appreciate you to provide examples of this instead of just talking without anything to back it up, maybe we can have a discussion about that and the staff that you believe are involved in witch hunting people not because they are breaking rules but because they are ''problematic'' (are u referring to haze or something?)
    0 points
  8. This isn't true and Rubik can let you know too if you don't want to take my word for it. The only other thing that is being collected besides answers is the time and date you submitted your responses. Plus I'm pretty sure that it literally says at the start that your email won't be shown to the form creator too.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...