Delta Absuing Voteban System

[Miami mint vape]

2 minutes ago, ChefSoda said:

Dude. You made a bogus report on me in the forums for having a base with cover with 0 evidence and it was approved within 3 hours. You are treated more than fairly by the staff on this server. Against, thats a red herring, not a defense. Saying staff members are lazy ‘doesn’t help you at all’.

The report i made on you also was not false as you were initially given a verbal warning for it , and the reason it was overturned into a actual warn was because it was a back to back verbal for the same rule break

[ChefSoda]

1 minute ago, Deltarino said:

The report i made on you also was not false as you were initially given a verbal warning for it , and the reason it was overturned into a actual warn was because it was a back to back verbal for the same rule break

Your claim was false though, I was not abusing the head/foot glitch. I can concede that you may not have “been properly educated” on as to the application of that rule as that rule has proven to be confusing & in need of revision for clarification. & I was not verbally warned for that specific reason, it was on a different build for having a keypad that didn’t have all the buttons exposed. It was by sheer coincidence that there was a real error in that the base had multiple floors, but still this should’ve been addressed when I called Steve over to verify if my base was following the basing rules.

 

Steve made an honest mistake when verifying my base for compliance (and for supporting your report), but you were intentionally vindictive. & In that context I think you deserve a full warn. 

[Miami mint vape]

claim wasnt false the president already exist that any body part you can hit i should be able to also hit simple as that , people have been warned for it before without priors and nonetheless blue has already stated due to the elevation of your base build you are still in the wrong in that aspect aswell

[Kert Kobean]

38 minutes ago, Deltarino said:

i don't you understand kert its not a problem of being something minor , its the fact no matter the sit i make it can be as simple as an rdm sit with a clip and logs to back it up the sit will not be taken even with 6 staff members online

thats unfortunate but like blue said you need to exhaust EVERY option before you call for a voteban. We can address underline issues with staff

[ChefSoda]

10 minutes ago, Deltarino said:

claim wasnt false the president already exist that any body part you can hit i should be able to also hit simple as that , people have been warned for it before without priors and nonetheless blue has already stated due to the elevation of your base build you are still in the wrong in that aspect aswell

You are thoroughly misunderstanding the rule & the intent behind the rule. The intention is that there cannot be “one-way engagement” structures that abuse a hitbox glitch where I can shoot your hitbox but 99.9% of mine would be covered but still allowing me to shoot yours.

[ChefSoda]

16 hours ago, Deltarino said:

so you want me to ask the unresponsive staff to respond? that doesn't make sense blue i have to ask xo or chairman to hop on 90% of the time to get on to take my simple RDM or NLR sits and i always have proof in the form of clips and my logs. its not a problem of me exhausting my options its a problem of staff continuously ignoring my sits and I've brought this up to several high ranking staff members but seems to me nothing changes.

By the way you are totally inadvertently snitching on your friends here.

If the sit guidelines are up-to-date that would be a direct violation of: “DON’T accept a sit just because your friend made it and you're trying to cover for whatever he did, that's favoritism and being corrupt.” 
 

Your friends on staff in this public thread are blatantly covering for you. Based on that alone it’s plausible that they would also do so in private sits against randos like myself. You hitting your friends up personally to hop on and take your sit is obvious favoritism, at the least it is the glaring appearance of favoritism.
 

If your admission is true, you shouldn’t even be allowed to be in sits where the ruling moderator is a personal friend that you can just hit up to hop on the game and take your sit.

[Ashtar Sheran]

With all the evidence i have seen i believe abuse of the vote system was used. And as others have said you must exhaust all options before doing so. An excellent example of a user doing this IMO is donut cat.

[1304]

3 hours ago, ChefSoda said:

DON’T accept a sit just because your friend made it

Brother, it says “don’t not accept just because it’s your friend.” It does not say “do not accept if it’s your friend.” If we couldn’t take our friends’ sits, half the staff team wouldn’t be taking sits. Henchy has a lot of friends in-game, and I have a lot of friends in-game too—just separate friendship from the situation in that moment.

 

That being said, to staff and everyone else, let’s vote on this. We don’t need any more back and forth.

[ChefSoda]

2 hours ago, 1304 said:

Brother, it says “don’t not accept just because it’s your friend.” It does not say “do not accept if it’s your friend.” If we couldn’t take our friends’ sits, half the staff team wouldn’t be taking sits. Henchy has a lot of friends in-game, and I have a lot of friends in-game too—just separate friendship from the situation in that moment.

 

That being said, to staff and everyone else, let’s vote on this. We don’t need any more back and forth.

You don’t think an example of “do not accept just because it’s your friend” is your friend hitting you up on discord and telling you to hop on the game to take your sit? By Delta’s own admission he is doing this 90% of the time.

 

And that’s only half of the point, they are almost certainly treating Delta with the utmost charity, favoritism, as they have in these very threads. Chair himself voted “-1 for appeal even though its an unenforced rule” for my appeal and voted “-1 for report even though its an unenforced rule” for Delta. 
 

I’m not salty about it, and Im not making a formal report on it. I am just pointing out that apparent favoritism is at play in PUBLIC FORUMS. What to speak of private sits where Delta personally hits up his friends out of the game and has them specifically log on with the sole purpose of to taking the sit? 
 

& I’m right there with you. Both of these threads should be voted on and ruled on. It’s taking up far too much mental bandwith and I’m ready for a ruling.
 

Delta’s bogus report on me for “exploiting the head/foot glitch” was litigated and accepted within 3 hours. I didn’t even get an opportunity to defend myself with his report (one of the main reasons this whole situation had me so agitated). This has been like 3 days of back-and-forth debate over something that is obviously non-compliance with the rules from a player that should already know better.

[Glorp]

This has become a yap fest, yes Delta should get his slap on the wrist verbal, this whole situation was heavily blown out and that's unacceptable. +1 for verbal on delta for false votes

Edited January 25 by Chairman Chair the Chair