Kert Kobean

Yes, very good for most part

next tier list

The argument that the SBC Cannon should return to its old re-equip-on-empty system assumes that its ten-shot ammunition limit is enough to balance the weapon. The problem is that ammunition capacity and access to the weapon itself are two different balancing factors. Ten shots may sound restrictive in isolation, but if a player can immediately re-equip the cannon after firing those ten shots, the practical limitation isn't really ten shots per life — it's ten shots per inventory cycle. That distinction matters considerably for a weapon capable of having a major impact on raids, firefights, and base defenses. The death requirement can therefore be viewed less as an additional punishment and more as a way of establishing a meaningful endpoint for the weapon's use. Without it, a player who survives an engagement can potentially reset their cannon and immediately return to using one of the server's most destructive tools. This means that simply surviving doesn't necessarily end the weapon's influence. A death-gated system creates a natural reset point: you can have your ten shots, but once you've used them, your current life with the cannon is over. The argument that this reduces player agency also overlooks the fact that every game mechanic places limits on player agency. Players already accept cooldowns, role restrictions, item limits, weapon restrictions, and other mechanics that prevent powerful tools from being used indefinitely. The fact that a restriction is inconvenient does not necessarily mean that it is poorly designed. In this case, tying the reset to death provides a clear and predictable rule rather than allowing players to repeatedly refresh a high-impact weapon whenever they exhaust its ammunition. There is also a flaw in the claim that the system inherently rewards players for dying. A player isn't necessarily better off by dying simply because death allows them to use the cannon again. Death carries its own costs: losing the current engagement, potentially losing resources, being removed from the situation, and having to respawn before returning to play. If anything, the mechanic creates a tradeoff between preserving your life and preserving access to the cannon. That can be intentional design rather than an accidental incentive to play recklessly. The comparison between a player who gets killed immediately and one who successfully uses all ten shots also isn't necessarily unfair. They have not experienced the same circumstances. The player who gets ten shots out of the cannon has already extracted substantially more value from it than someone who died immediately. The fact that both eventually have to reach a death/reset state doesn't mean they received the same outcome during their lives. More importantly, the idea that ten shots are automatically sufficient because each shot is limited ignores the effectiveness of those shots. A weapon doesn't need unlimited ammunition to be overpowered. If every shot can dramatically alter an engagement, ten shots can represent a substantial amount of influence, especially when the player is able to remain alive and repeatedly acquire more ammunition or another cannon without having to relinquish their current life. The death requirement can also serve as a safeguard against situations where the cannon becomes the default solution to every conflict. If players know that exhausting the cannon means they must eventually lose their current life before obtaining another one, there is a meaningful opportunity cost to deploying it. Players have to decide when those ten shots are actually worth using rather than treating the cannon as a renewable resource. Ultimately, the disagreement comes down to what the ten-shot limit is supposed to represent. If it is merely an ammunition limit, then the old system makes sense. But if the cannon is intended to be an extremely powerful, limited-use tool, then restricting it to one cannon per life creates a much stronger and more meaningful limitation. The death requirement doesn't necessarily undermine the sandbox nature of the server; it can be what prevents one of the server's most disruptive weapons from becoming endlessly reusable. Reverting the mechanic would therefore solve the frustration described in the original argument, but it could also remove one of the few meaningful restrictions on repeatedly accessing the SBC Cannon. The question isn't simply whether players should have more freedom to re-equip it. It's whether a weapon with that level of destructive potential should be renewable without requiring the player to give up their current life. If the goal is to keep the cannon powerful without allowing it to dominate prolonged engagements, the death requirement provides a straightforward way to accomplish that.

more to follow don't worry

Hello titsrp, it's me infamous minecraft Content Creator and data deletion enthusiast Sanzu here with titsrp tier list sequel (or tier list 2) Remember this is all 100% factual information collected from months of research and 400,000 anonymous testimonials from real titsrp players and if you disagree with me you're wrong and should feel bad Superadmins: Rubik Pros: Owner of server cons: please somebody do a wellness check Overall rating: B- Admins: Blue Pros: Following his lengthy LOA, Blue has returned to TitsRP showing a lot more vigor than he has in the last few months. He's been far more active in the community, in game, and has returned to properly managing the staff team. Cons: Can sometimes be a LITTLE combative with problematic parts of the community (which while fucking hilarious can backfire at times) Overall Rating and Notes: A. The LOA he took combined with more community engagement has done a lot for him quality wise. While he's obviously not 100% flawless he's finally back to being someone who deserves his position and is comfortable performing in it. Vex Pros: Despite being pretty freshly new to the role, Vex has adapted to it practically instantly and has already pushed for some major changes within the team. Vex has a good standing in the community as well, and hasn't had an incident yet to name. Cons: Still euro trash tea drinking disgusting brit I hope someone pours his fuckass leaf juice into another harbor Overall Rating and Notes: S. Vex has hit the ground running following his long overdue promotion and has already had a very positive impact on the team as a whole. Senior Moderators: Tali Pros: Not much else to add from last time. Tali has continuously shown improvement, and while I cant give any particular examples since he's been on Loa, he's still been doing a solid job. Cons: Tali could still probably stand to adamantly stand on business when it comes to higher up decisions. Overall Rating and Notes: A-. Tali is still doing a good job and hasn't had an incident yet to name. Get off LOA, nerd. ChefSoda Pros: Like predicted, Chef was pretty much a No Brainer candidate for SMod. He has good common sense opinions on the forums, is active in both the community and in game, and is a good example of what the mod team should strive for. Cons: The only con I can really name beyond a few mild complaints I've heard about him here and there is simply that he's too new to have made a major impact yet. Overall Rating and Notes: B+. Keep up the good work, settle into the role, and over time you'll start standing out more whilst being able to voice your opinions and stances more effectively. Succ the Zucc Pros: It makes me physically perhaps even violently ill to compliment him. I get cold sweats, my hands shake, and I get sent into violent rages. I've killed 2 coworkers so far just trying to force myself to give it props. They are unrecognizable. Numerous investigations have been launched. I'm currently the target of an international manhunt. My rampage is not over yet. Before I'm caught and summarily sentenced to death, I will kill again. As I type, I am currently in the midst of sawing my own left foot off. Succ has shown significant growth during his time as staff, a common trend pretty much anyone will say if asked how Succ has been performing as of late. He's mellowed out significantly, and to the surprise of myself and many others hasn't been a TERRIBLE smod candidate so far. Cons: The voices won't stop. They're telling me to kill again. Very Jewish. Still smells like feet. Fuck you Overall Ranking and Notes: B. I wear their skin now. It hides me from identification. Blue Shirt Pros: NGL haven't seen the guy since I came back. Haven't heard anything bad though, solid pog champ I think idk Cons: let me review you chud Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Make yourself known more Blue Skirt. Moderators: Crow Pros: I love you crochaco. Crowmind. We are Crow. Cro? Cro? Cro? Handles his sits properly like a silly goofy guy should. Could be more present on the forums lowk tho cro Cons: hi cro please forum more cro Overall Ranking and Notes: B+. Still missing his t2. Good mod, possible future smod. Please forums more thank u cro Sleepy post Pros: this fucker got off before I could review his sits and didn't get back on. He WAS on though, so no wellness check needed. Solid moderator I think Cons: Needs to do more mod things like forums responses Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Solid and safe mod pick Smoking that Bukapak (Bukavac) Pros: Was on LOA for a pretty damn long time, but his sit quality is solid. Understands his tools available and knows how to use them when needed. Down to Earth during his sits, which is always a positive trait. Cons: Some slack is obviously deserved considering he was reviewed after having JUST returned from LOA, but could stand to be a bit more assertive in his sits as to maintain control of them a bit better. Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Outside of his slight issues with sit management, a solid moderator overall. Choom Pros: Has had a MASSIVE glow up since the last tier list. Other members of staff pretty much only have positive things to say about him. Has good community interaction, positive outreach, solid sit quality, and no notable incidents regarding his staffing career. Cons: The only cons I can really think of may just be to maintain a more active forums presence if even that. Overall Ranking and Notes: A-. Future SMod candidate. Fontaine Pros: While seeing Fontaine back is pretty surprising, he so far hasn't been an unwelcome addition to the team. His sit quality is solid if not a bit spotty, and while leniency is important Fontaine can sometimes be a bit TOO lenient (refer to the PD sign incident). Still, by no stretch would I say Fontaine is a bad moderator and has a very positive reputation in the community. Cons: Beyond the fact that he can sometimes be a bit too lenient, having private discords off server can SOMETIMES lead to problems with staff security. Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. Fontaine is absolutely a solid moderator, and what little flaws he has are easily solvable. Would still he careful regarding the new discord server however. StaticCG Pros: Static despite being a pretty fresh mod has had a surprisingly positive impact on the community and the team as a whole. He's received plenty of praise regarding his attitude from his peers, comes off as a pretty easygoing guy, and I haven't heard anything bad from anyone as far as his sit quality goes. Cons: Static has had problems with being subtle at times. Sits can sometimes require watching before acting, which can lead to problems if you skip that in favor of immediately confronting the issue head on. Overall Ranking and Notes: B. The guy absolutely has a kickass attitude I can appreciate, he just needs to work on that one issue. Ego Pros: NGL idk if he's on loa or what but I haven't really seen him do anything yet. I don't really see him in game, on forums, and as far as community interaction goes I've really only ever seen him being negative and engaged in some kind of drama. Cons: Very toxic personality which has not changed even slightly since becoming staff. No issues when he does this as a player, but as a mod it's not a great look. Overall Ranking and Notes: C-. Maybe instead of reapplying when you know the person that's gonna deny you is on LOA, just work to be a better person so they don't have a reason to deny you in the first place? Pibble (Xoxt) Pros: Absolute jitaholic. Is SCARED to base. Good mod though, very solid sit quality, well liked by a majority of the community, loses rdm zone a lot though Cons: Doesn't have a base dupe with anti Thomas capabilities, would advise. Overall Ranking and Notes: B+. Solid mod in pretty much every staff run he's had with only a few issues here and there. Gods Left Testicle Pros: Dude I'm really fucking sorry I still haven't seen you do like anything yet Cons: Bro at this point just start spamming slurs in gen chat so I know you're alive Overall Ranking and Notes: N/A I literally can't rate him I haven't seen him. Civlian (Civlllian? Civivilan? Civi? Fuck it I'm calling him Fentanyl) Pros: I haven't seen anything BAD from the guy and apparently he has a pulse considering he's put a decent amount of hours in over the last few weeks. Need further insight though Cons: Zenith member ew Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. I'm zenith bias SexyBatman Pros: Has one of the only bans I've ever seen for noncompliance from two years ago which makes me giggle Cons: I don't know who this is Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. He's a moderator. Steel chair Pros: REST IN PEACE BRO idk I think I heard he got hit with a steel chaoir Cons: I won't speak negative of the dearly departed Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. Idk B+ fuck it Mr. Whiskers Enjoyer Pros: I fw them heavy lowk no cap on Suga. Haven't seen a shit ton of them but I don't think I've heard of anyone having had a bad interaction with them before either myself included. Cons: Probably a furry Overall Ranking and Notes: B. I cant rate furries any higher without verification. Trial Moderators. Александр431 преимущества: Отличная работа, товарищ. Проникновение началось. Продолжай продвигаться по служебной лестнице. Мы еще одолеем европейских свиней. минусы: Tы забрал мой обед из холодильника, ублюдок. Итоговые замечания и рейтинг: Наш лучший агент. Уровень A. Minshi Pros: Former SMod and active femboy coming back for round 2, stay tuned chat Cons: Fucking SUCKS at Deadlock. Like you have no fucking idea. I actually don't know how. Walking feed. Overall Ranking and Notes: A. Would be A+ but unfortunately needs to practice deadlock Beeteeth Pros: What the fuck were you guys thinking (jokes aside has actually significantly improved since last staff run still wtf were you thinking) Cons: Woman moderator (always bad) Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Maybe just keep her forever tmod this time lowk no cap Honorable Mentions: Ratancholia Pros: Really likes cheese Cons: "fuck the guidelines" Overall Rating and Notes: F-. Better luck next time king Okay that's all everyone enjoy thank you remember this is all fact and any complaints are false thank you

https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nxBu6WrMNzFwxAo8T?invite=cr-MSxyUUMsNzExNjM2MTQ4

soon

soon

I'm waiting to add them for their epic comeback

I will receive 50000 more testimonials by next month

im too racist to add him. I'm also biased, sexist, antisemetic, homophobic, xenophobic, arachnophobic, transphobic, aquaphobic, phobiaphobic

idk cry more baby bitch boy you and the other dog shit staff member are the only ones taking this seriously go call another vote or something

I did say this was all satire and if you got offended by that it says more about you than me man

you'd only be offended if you feel the above applies to you

Testimonials disagree sorry

worst agmin O.A.T

hundreds of testimonials say otherwise sorry

Hello gang, it's your favorite Minecraft Content Creator Sanzu here to provide a definitive staff tierlist after collecting hundreds of anonymous testimonials from very real people who I'll not be revealing nor ever responding to any questions regarding their very real identities (they are real trust me) (this is also satire and if it upsets you you're part of the problem) ------------------------------------------- Superadmins: Rubik Pros: he's aight cons: he's aight Overall rating; B- Admins: Blue Pros: Experienced, understandably handles sits well. Can usually find a balanced middle ground as far as leniency goes, and has a good understanding of the importance of PR when making decisions. Cons: Has a long and common trend of making emotionally weighted or hasty decisions. Infamous examples include telling the entire staff team to not take sits from a group of players, pushing a massive negatively received change regarding how sits should be handled and taken, and inconsistently enforcing guidelines. Overall Rating and Notes: B. While he is the best admin we've had following the resignation, it's not a particularly high bar. Blue also suffers from IRL issues which can impact and hamper him (to no fault of his own). Blue could Overall benefit from taking more time to think decisions and their consequences through, but beyond that does his best with the very limited resources he has. Melancholia Pros: During their last staff run, was considered a quality SMod and showed massive improvement in a short span of time for the role. Has always had good sit quality throughout multiple staff runs, and for the most part does a good job at remaining impartial for what situations they do get themselves involved in. Cons: They were thrusted back into a role they had no time to ease into, then for whatever reason was bumped again into Admin. Melancholia on this staff run very rarely gets involved in situations that demand a higher up's attention, lacks any form of real leadership qualities, has contributed to no meaningful decisions or changes, and for all intents and purposes really feels like a DEI hire meant to fill a slot. Overall Rating and Notes: C-. Mel needs to start embodying the role he was given and start actually contributing to the server and decisions related to it. We've had more than enough inactive admins in the past and present and right now the cycle continues until Mel is more comfortable with the role he was thrusted into. Senior Moderators: Tali Pros: Tali has done a surprisingly good job with his new role, showing huge growth from their decent performance as a moderator. Tali has shown the ability to perform sits well, maintain reliable activity, and stay impartial in a vast majority of situations. Tali also does a good job maintaining good public relationships between the staff team and the community. Cons: Like most of the higher up team, a common trend is lacking some leadership qualities. Could benefit from a bit more backbone with their decisions. Overall Rating and Notes: A-. Tali is pretty much exactly the baseline of how an SMod should act. While he could absolutely benefit from better leadership qualities, he at the very least does lead well by example. No major notes or problems beyond that. Fujiyama Pros: From what very limited info I have since his promotion he hasn't really done anything problematic or bad. Pink Moderator. Cons: I literally have no idea if he's still alive or not Overall Rating and Notes: Wellness Check please Steve the Hare Harrington Pros: Sit quality is pretty much average. No real hangups during their time as an SMod. Maintains solid relationships between staff and the community for the most part. Cons: Still struggles to fully adapt to the role he was rushed into. Makes very safe decisions or avoids interaction with situations that could result in backlash against him. The Nancy larping is also a little weird. Like other SMods, lacks any notable leadership qualities. Overall Ranking and Notes: C. While not "bad" enough worth making any real notes about, Steve after all this time still struggles to come off as an "SMod" versus an above average mod. Steve needs to start actively participating in decisions and demonstrate leadership traits (which he probably could have done had he not been thrust into his position). Vex Pros: One of the few (if not the only) SMods actually able to demonstrate the ability to possess a backbone and act as a leader when needed. Has prior experience as an SMod, and actually worked their way back to the role. Vex has a good sit quality, the ability to remain impartial when needed, and retains good activity, interjecting when higher up attention is needed. Cons: Tea and crumpet devouring fucking euro brit fuck your timezone chud Overall Ranking and Notes: A. Besides being a disgusting euro subhuman Vex has always been in both this run and his last a reliable higher up and is another hallmark for how SMods should carry themselves. Blue Shirt Pros: Honestly a sleeper pick that should have gotten the role a good while back. Too early to judge his abilities as an smod right now, but his abilities and demeanor as a mod were respectable. Remains impartial, solid sit quality, etc etc. Cons: Too early to really speak of any. Tier list rating subject to change Overall Ranking and Notes: B. If he can maintain his qualities as a mod and fit himself into the role as a leader, could EASILY become an A tier SMod. Just needs to avoid common pitfalls such as indecisiveness and emotional decisions a lot of SMods tend to fall into early on. Hidden Chaos Pros: Despite being put into an awkward position following the mass resignation, Hidden has maintained a pretty solid quality as an SMod, and truly did earn himself the position. He has solid sit quality, maintains good communication with the rest of the staff team, and hasn't done anything negative worth noting. Cons: VERY safe decision making process, almost to a fault. Hidden rarely communicates with the community beyond VCs, has a below average forums presence, rarely makes any decisions on his own, nor does he spearhead his own stances when they are required. Overall Ranking and Notes: C+. While again not bad by any metric, Hidden along with many SMods struggle to properly lead when needed. Hidden especially rarely gets involved in a vast majority of situations and struggles to stand out among the other SMods. Could do with a bit more spine. Madx04something Pros: N/A Cons: At his absolute peak last staff run his reputation was "the guy who did absolutely nothing and resigned". Since his return as an emergency DEI hire, he has managed to go from doing absolutely nothing to making exclusively bad decisions. He has already been given a strike for inciting staff to make bad decisions, has a horrible public reputation, has repeatedly demonstrated OBVIOUS biased choices noticed even by other staff members. MadX has done nothing positive for the server at all since being promoted, frequently abuses his position, actively combats members of the community, and should be demoted now that he no longer needs to fill the slot he was brought in to fill. Overall Ranking and Notes: Worse than Hitler. Absolutely no advice needed beyond resignation or being inevitably demoted before that happens. Moderators: Crow Pros: His sits are fast and efficient with little room for criticism. Has a very positive reputation in the community, demonstrates the ability to remain remarkably impartial, and overall not a lot of issues to name. Cons: Could stand to be a bit more active on the forums and be a leader at times for smaller situations. Overall Ranking and Notes: B+. Give him back his T2 bee you greedy Doberman. Future SMod potential. Sleepy post Pros: Haven't seen much of them, but they do have a good reputation from their last view staff runs. Overall pretty much the definition of a solid moderator. Decent sit quality, decent community interaction, decent decentness. Cons: Could HEAVILY benefit from more activity and community interaction. More forums responses wouldn't hurt either. Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Please give this man a wellness check. ChefSoda Pros: Chef has been yet another shocking sleeper pick. The guy has good forums responses, is able to possess a good amount of backbone by expressing and defending his own opinions. I cant say much about their sit quality but the guy is an above average moderator despite a reasonably short run as staff so far. Cons: Honestly? Not much to list here. Could probably do with a bit more leadership to help him make the gap from Mod to SMod, but as of right now he does a solid job. Overall Ranking and Notes: A-. Easily a future SMod candidate. Not a retard (rare mod quality) Choom Pros: Decent enough. As far as being exclusively a mod goes, Choom does a passable enough job. Frequent community interaction, solid enough forums activity (even if the quality isn't all there) Cons: Pretty much the bare minimum of what a mod should be. Not necessarily a bad thing obviously, but aggressively unremarkable and pretty much just a sit slave. Overall Ranking and Notes: C+. If he wants to just be resigned to being a sitslave then the only note I have is to do more research on forums posts before voting. If he ever wants to make the leap to SMod however, he needs to drastically improve both in his leadership qualities and relations with the community. Definitely something to work at for a decent while. MildTsunami Pros: I have never had one positive interaction with this guy. I truly cannot list anything positive beyond the fact he seems decently active on forums. Cons: From my limited interactions with this guy, they seem combative, refuse to properly research before posting votes on the forums, and afk for playtime on the server. On the rare occasions I hop on, Mild also doesn't seem to take very many sits either. Overall Ranking and Notes: D. Needs dramatic improvement or to just resign. Waltuh Smallcox Pros: Genuinely haven't seen this guy do like anything in a long ass time. From what I remember they aren't bad by any stretch however. Cons: Possibly deceased Overall Ranking and Notes: C+. Please give this guy a wellness check Ruvtuu (Chairman Chair the Chair) Pros: Has shown the most growth I've ever seen in a staff member. Following their return to the team, Glorp/Riv/Chair has adopted a leadership role surpassing a majority of the upper staff team, has enough of a spine to make their own opinions and defend them, does proper research when making votes, and has a solid relationship with the community. Cons: Is gay Overall Ranking and Notes: A. Chairman has been very receptive to criticism across a number of staff runs (even if it took a good while). Easily a future SMod candidate. BatteryEaterOG Pros: Wait this guy is still staff?? Cons: I didn't even know this guy was still staff. Still a chud though Overall Ranking and Notes: C-. Go back to the forever LOA Gods Left Testicle Pros: Honestly no fault to this guy I genuinely haven't seen anything positive from him on account of being a newer staff Cons: A recent ban appeal has given a decent insight into his staffing qualities at this point in time. Banning a player for 3d for saying someone is fat in anon is EGREGIOUSLY other the top priors or not, especially when the player wasn't even given a chance to defend themselves. Overall Ranking and Notes: C-. Reread punishment guidelines and the TMod training sheet. Warlock Pros: chill guy, took my sit and handled it good. Slow, but good Cons: Uhhh his name I don't like it Overall Ranking and Notes: B. It's warlocking time Green Eyed Ghoul Pros: If I was making this list a few months ago I would have absolutely nothing to list here. Lately though the guy has actually had some decent forums opinions, relatively active presence on the server, etc etc. Cons: Still has the reputation from the start of his staffing career as someone who is decently biased and prone to pettiness. While hard to say if he still has these traits, his very rare if ever outreach to the community outside of occasional arguments hasn't done him many favors in dispelling this reputation Overall Ranking and Notes: C. Their staffing has improved pretty well to be fair, though their community relations still need a LOT of work. (GN) Isaac Pros: Has enough self awareness to switch back to mod instead of wasting an SMod slot doing absolutely nothing like some people. Decent sit quality and above average community reputation. Cons: An emergency DEI hire that accepted the role as SMod purely for the sake of being an SMod. Frequently combatted with members of the community, ignored genuine attempts to receive higher up help because he was annoyed he got pinged (as an smod). Very poor activity and overall disappointing during his time as a higher up despite his reputation as an old head. Overall Ranking and Notes: D+. If you don't have time to staff and are easily annoyed by being pinged, then don't become staff. Clowdle Pros: Alr flatout let me be honest I was going through the list and actually had to think about who this was Cons: dude who the fuck is this guy Overall Ranking and Notes: C? Uhhh yeah idk man this guy is a mod ig Steel chair Pros: From what I remember he's a good staff member I think, a little slow in the head though Cons: man I literally don't know these people have been too inactive for me to make fun of Overall Ranking and Notes: B-? Dude seriously can we start checking in on some of these mode I'm worried Crispy John - Too new, not gonna waste energy ranking until they do something (next tier list) ihateops Pros: John Sit Slave Cons: John Sit Slave Overall Ranking and Notes: C. He sitslaves and that's just okay Succ the Zucc Pros: Not typically swayed by other votes, will defend their opinions to a fault. On occasion does have decent takes (rare as they are). Has a decent reputation in some pockets of the community. (See I can compliment you) Cons: Has a VERY big problem with the way he carries himself. Frequently holds long standing grudges with members of the community, uses the "blunt" card to be a shameless dick more often than not, has AWFUL forums quality at times (nobody wants to read a vote 4 words long). Succ has also historically had an issue listening to higher up members of staff, very nearly resulting in a demotion. Overall Ranking and Notes: D. Anything I could list here would be completely wasted and ignored so all I can recommend is resigning. TheRealNiggaNoobslayer Pros: None Cons: Runnerup for quite possibly the worst staff member in recent history. Has an awful attitude problem, a terrible reputation in the community, poor sit quality, barely any informed forums activity, is actively combative with the community, and once again uses the "blunt" card as an excuse to be an insufferable ass. The only reason he has not been demoted is because he uses the excuse of his "medication" impacting how he staffs yet still refuses to resign. Overall Ranking and Notes: F. Resign and never reapply again. Anoo666 Pros: good one Cons: Without question the worst staff member we've had in recent history bar absolutely none. Makes repeated beginner level mistakes, has SOMEHOW by the grace of God managed to avoid being demoted despite being warned twice for the same thing in the same month, has a terrible reputation both in the community and from other members of staff, refuses to learn from his mistakes, can't accept any amount of criticism, and is incompetent enough to the point where randoms have to teach him how to properly staff. Overall Ranking and Notes: F-. Should never staff again anywhere probably period. Trial Moderators (worth mentioning) Wosh Pros: Too new, nothing positive to note yet Cons: Recently handled a situation in game VERY poorly. Not a great look for a TMod at all. Overall Ranking and Notes: C-. Retrain needed. Peterson Pros: None so far Cons: Nothing public, but this guy has been a TMod for an OBNOXIOUSLY long time. At best he chooses to be a tmod, and worse he's committed enough monumental fuckups behind the scenes to not be promoted yet. Overall Ranking and Notes: D. Either promote this guy or fail his TMod phase if he's that bad Honorable Mentions: Henchy Pros: He wanted to be on the list. Told retards not to be retards. REST IN PEACE BRO Cons: Will not stop griefing my lane Riot please ban him Overall Rating and Notes: A+ fuck you idiot BeeTeeth Pros: After many years Bee finally seems to start accepting mild pieces of criticism Cons: Is a woman Overall Ranking and Notes: C. Be better next staff run idiot Blacnova Pros: finally resigned Cons: unironically a worse admin than Rivtuu somehow not even sure how genuinely impressive Overall Ranking and Notes: F. VRChat player. Never apply again DEI admin Thank you everyone this is Sanzu signing off!!! (Fuck you madx resign idiot)

brother he is literally an admin and is one of three people who decide on what rules get implemented you donut

phew, was worried for a minute

wait are we confident this isn't an alt of somebody

yeah not a single person in the community is gonna help you refine this dog shit idea anymore than what you've brainstormed

also how long till this guy realizes there's a suggestions channel

i like ramen

it was me