Kert Kobean

soon

soon

soon

Yes, very good for most part

next tier list

The argument that the SBC Cannon should return to its old re-equip-on-empty system assumes that its ten-shot ammunition limit is enough to balance the weapon. The problem is that ammunition capacity and access to the weapon itself are two different balancing factors. Ten shots may sound restrictive in isolation, but if a player can immediately re-equip the cannon after firing those ten shots, the practical limitation isn't really ten shots per life — it's ten shots per inventory cycle. That distinction matters considerably for a weapon capable of having a major impact on raids, firefights, and base defenses. The death requirement can therefore be viewed less as an additional punishment and more as a way of establishing a meaningful endpoint for the weapon's use. Without it, a player who survives an engagement can potentially reset their cannon and immediately return to using one of the server's most destructive tools. This means that simply surviving doesn't necessarily end the weapon's influence. A death-gated system creates a natural reset point: you can have your ten shots, but once you've used them, your current life with the cannon is over. The argument that this reduces player agency also overlooks the fact that every game mechanic places limits on player agency. Players already accept cooldowns, role restrictions, item limits, weapon restrictions, and other mechanics that prevent powerful tools from being used indefinitely. The fact that a restriction is inconvenient does not necessarily mean that it is poorly designed. In this case, tying the reset to death provides a clear and predictable rule rather than allowing players to repeatedly refresh a high-impact weapon whenever they exhaust its ammunition. There is also a flaw in the claim that the system inherently rewards players for dying. A player isn't necessarily better off by dying simply because death allows them to use the cannon again. Death carries its own costs: losing the current engagement, potentially losing resources, being removed from the situation, and having to respawn before returning to play. If anything, the mechanic creates a tradeoff between preserving your life and preserving access to the cannon. That can be intentional design rather than an accidental incentive to play recklessly. The comparison between a player who gets killed immediately and one who successfully uses all ten shots also isn't necessarily unfair. They have not experienced the same circumstances. The player who gets ten shots out of the cannon has already extracted substantially more value from it than someone who died immediately. The fact that both eventually have to reach a death/reset state doesn't mean they received the same outcome during their lives. More importantly, the idea that ten shots are automatically sufficient because each shot is limited ignores the effectiveness of those shots. A weapon doesn't need unlimited ammunition to be overpowered. If every shot can dramatically alter an engagement, ten shots can represent a substantial amount of influence, especially when the player is able to remain alive and repeatedly acquire more ammunition or another cannon without having to relinquish their current life. The death requirement can also serve as a safeguard against situations where the cannon becomes the default solution to every conflict. If players know that exhausting the cannon means they must eventually lose their current life before obtaining another one, there is a meaningful opportunity cost to deploying it. Players have to decide when those ten shots are actually worth using rather than treating the cannon as a renewable resource. Ultimately, the disagreement comes down to what the ten-shot limit is supposed to represent. If it is merely an ammunition limit, then the old system makes sense. But if the cannon is intended to be an extremely powerful, limited-use tool, then restricting it to one cannon per life creates a much stronger and more meaningful limitation. The death requirement doesn't necessarily undermine the sandbox nature of the server; it can be what prevents one of the server's most disruptive weapons from becoming endlessly reusable. Reverting the mechanic would therefore solve the frustration described in the original argument, but it could also remove one of the few meaningful restrictions on repeatedly accessing the SBC Cannon. The question isn't simply whether players should have more freedom to re-equip it. It's whether a weapon with that level of destructive potential should be renewable without requiring the player to give up their current life. If the goal is to keep the cannon powerful without allowing it to dominate prolonged engagements, the death requirement provides a straightforward way to accomplish that.

more to follow don't worry

Hello titsrp, it's me infamous minecraft Content Creator and data deletion enthusiast Sanzu here with titsrp tier list sequel (or tier list 2) Remember this is all 100% factual information collected from months of research and 400,000 anonymous testimonials from real titsrp players and if you disagree with me you're wrong and should feel bad Superadmins: Rubik Pros: Owner of server cons: please somebody do a wellness check Overall rating: B- Admins: Blue Pros: Following his lengthy LOA, Blue has returned to TitsRP showing a lot more vigor than he has in the last few months. He's been far more active in the community, in game, and has returned to properly managing the staff team. Cons: Can sometimes be a LITTLE combative with problematic parts of the community (which while fucking hilarious can backfire at times) Overall Rating and Notes: A. The LOA he took combined with more community engagement has done a lot for him quality wise. While he's obviously not 100% flawless he's finally back to being someone who deserves his position and is comfortable performing in it. Vex Pros: Despite being pretty freshly new to the role, Vex has adapted to it practically instantly and has already pushed for some major changes within the team. Vex has a good standing in the community as well, and hasn't had an incident yet to name. Cons: Still euro trash tea drinking disgusting brit I hope someone pours his fuckass leaf juice into another harbor Overall Rating and Notes: S. Vex has hit the ground running following his long overdue promotion and has already had a very positive impact on the team as a whole. Senior Moderators: Tali Pros: Not much else to add from last time. Tali has continuously shown improvement, and while I cant give any particular examples since he's been on Loa, he's still been doing a solid job. Cons: Tali could still probably stand to adamantly stand on business when it comes to higher up decisions. Overall Rating and Notes: A-. Tali is still doing a good job and hasn't had an incident yet to name. Get off LOA, nerd. ChefSoda Pros: Like predicted, Chef was pretty much a No Brainer candidate for SMod. He has good common sense opinions on the forums, is active in both the community and in game, and is a good example of what the mod team should strive for. Cons: The only con I can really name beyond a few mild complaints I've heard about him here and there is simply that he's too new to have made a major impact yet. Overall Rating and Notes: B+. Keep up the good work, settle into the role, and over time you'll start standing out more whilst being able to voice your opinions and stances more effectively. Succ the Zucc Pros: It makes me physically perhaps even violently ill to compliment him. I get cold sweats, my hands shake, and I get sent into violent rages. I've killed 2 coworkers so far just trying to force myself to give it props. They are unrecognizable. Numerous investigations have been launched. I'm currently the target of an international manhunt. My rampage is not over yet. Before I'm caught and summarily sentenced to death, I will kill again. As I type, I am currently in the midst of sawing my own left foot off. Succ has shown significant growth during his time as staff, a common trend pretty much anyone will say if asked how Succ has been performing as of late. He's mellowed out significantly, and to the surprise of myself and many others hasn't been a TERRIBLE smod candidate so far. Cons: The voices won't stop. They're telling me to kill again. Very Jewish. Still smells like feet. Fuck you Overall Ranking and Notes: B. I wear their skin now. It hides me from identification. Blue Shirt Pros: NGL haven't seen the guy since I came back. Haven't heard anything bad though, solid pog champ I think idk Cons: let me review you chud Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Make yourself known more Blue Skirt. Moderators: Crow Pros: I love you crochaco. Crowmind. We are Crow. Cro? Cro? Cro? Handles his sits properly like a silly goofy guy should. Could be more present on the forums lowk tho cro Cons: hi cro please forum more cro Overall Ranking and Notes: B+. Still missing his t2. Good mod, possible future smod. Please forums more thank u cro Sleepy post Pros: this fucker got off before I could review his sits and didn't get back on. He WAS on though, so no wellness check needed. Solid moderator I think Cons: Needs to do more mod things like forums responses Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Solid and safe mod pick Smoking that Bukapak (Bukavac) Pros: Was on LOA for a pretty damn long time, but his sit quality is solid. Understands his tools available and knows how to use them when needed. Down to Earth during his sits, which is always a positive trait. Cons: Some slack is obviously deserved considering he was reviewed after having JUST returned from LOA, but could stand to be a bit more assertive in his sits as to maintain control of them a bit better. Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Outside of his slight issues with sit management, a solid moderator overall. Choom Pros: Has had a MASSIVE glow up since the last tier list. Other members of staff pretty much only have positive things to say about him. Has good community interaction, positive outreach, solid sit quality, and no notable incidents regarding his staffing career. Cons: The only cons I can really think of may just be to maintain a more active forums presence if even that. Overall Ranking and Notes: A-. Future SMod candidate. Fontaine Pros: While seeing Fontaine back is pretty surprising, he so far hasn't been an unwelcome addition to the team. His sit quality is solid if not a bit spotty, and while leniency is important Fontaine can sometimes be a bit TOO lenient (refer to the PD sign incident). Still, by no stretch would I say Fontaine is a bad moderator and has a very positive reputation in the community. Cons: Beyond the fact that he can sometimes be a bit too lenient, having private discords off server can SOMETIMES lead to problems with staff security. Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. Fontaine is absolutely a solid moderator, and what little flaws he has are easily solvable. Would still he careful regarding the new discord server however. StaticCG Pros: Static despite being a pretty fresh mod has had a surprisingly positive impact on the community and the team as a whole. He's received plenty of praise regarding his attitude from his peers, comes off as a pretty easygoing guy, and I haven't heard anything bad from anyone as far as his sit quality goes. Cons: Static has had problems with being subtle at times. Sits can sometimes require watching before acting, which can lead to problems if you skip that in favor of immediately confronting the issue head on. Overall Ranking and Notes: B. The guy absolutely has a kickass attitude I can appreciate, he just needs to work on that one issue. Ego Pros: NGL idk if he's on loa or what but I haven't really seen him do anything yet. I don't really see him in game, on forums, and as far as community interaction goes I've really only ever seen him being negative and engaged in some kind of drama. Cons: Very toxic personality which has not changed even slightly since becoming staff. No issues when he does this as a player, but as a mod it's not a great look. Overall Ranking and Notes: C-. Maybe instead of reapplying when you know the person that's gonna deny you is on LOA, just work to be a better person so they don't have a reason to deny you in the first place? Pibble (Xoxt) Pros: Absolute jitaholic. Is SCARED to base. Good mod though, very solid sit quality, well liked by a majority of the community, loses rdm zone a lot though Cons: Doesn't have a base dupe with anti Thomas capabilities, would advise. Overall Ranking and Notes: B+. Solid mod in pretty much every staff run he's had with only a few issues here and there. Gods Left Testicle Pros: Dude I'm really fucking sorry I still haven't seen you do like anything yet Cons: Bro at this point just start spamming slurs in gen chat so I know you're alive Overall Ranking and Notes: N/A I literally can't rate him I haven't seen him. Civlian (Civlllian? Civivilan? Civi? Fuck it I'm calling him Fentanyl) Pros: I haven't seen anything BAD from the guy and apparently he has a pulse considering he's put a decent amount of hours in over the last few weeks. Need further insight though Cons: Zenith member ew Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. I'm zenith bias SexyBatman Pros: Has one of the only bans I've ever seen for noncompliance from two years ago which makes me giggle Cons: I don't know who this is Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. He's a moderator. Steel chair Pros: REST IN PEACE BRO idk I think I heard he got hit with a steel chaoir Cons: I won't speak negative of the dearly departed Overall Ranking and Notes: B-. Idk B+ fuck it Mr. Whiskers Enjoyer Pros: I fw them heavy lowk no cap on Suga. Haven't seen a shit ton of them but I don't think I've heard of anyone having had a bad interaction with them before either myself included. Cons: Probably a furry Overall Ranking and Notes: B. I cant rate furries any higher without verification. Trial Moderators. Александр431 преимущества: Отличная работа, товарищ. Проникновение началось. Продолжай продвигаться по служебной лестнице. Мы еще одолеем европейских свиней. минусы: Tы забрал мой обед из холодильника, ублюдок. Итоговые замечания и рейтинг: Наш лучший агент. Уровень A. Minshi Pros: Former SMod and active femboy coming back for round 2, stay tuned chat Cons: Fucking SUCKS at Deadlock. Like you have no fucking idea. I actually don't know how. Walking feed. Overall Ranking and Notes: A. Would be A+ but unfortunately needs to practice deadlock Beeteeth Pros: What the fuck were you guys thinking (jokes aside has actually significantly improved since last staff run still wtf were you thinking) Cons: Woman moderator (always bad) Overall Ranking and Notes: B. Maybe just keep her forever tmod this time lowk no cap Honorable Mentions: Ratancholia Pros: Really likes cheese Cons: "fuck the guidelines" Overall Rating and Notes: F-. Better luck next time king Okay that's all everyone enjoy thank you remember this is all fact and any complaints are false thank you

https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nxBu6WrMNzFwxAo8T?invite=cr-MSxyUUMsNzExNjM2MTQ4

soon

soon

I'm waiting to add them for their epic comeback

I will receive 50000 more testimonials by next month

im too racist to add him. I'm also biased, sexist, antisemetic, homophobic, xenophobic, arachnophobic, transphobic, aquaphobic, phobiaphobic

idk cry more baby bitch boy you and the other dog shit staff member are the only ones taking this seriously go call another vote or something