I was warned for someone elses explosive.

[Jewann]

if you have proof of marshal running into the explosion just to die and that you are friends with the other 3, i am +1 for warn removal. otherwise, -1

[Guest]

I believe that this appeal is Valid and so, i'll +1 this

 

Why?

 - It wasn't the victim's C4

 - All the parties involved were consenting (UNLESS MARSHALL DID GET KILLED BY IT; In which way who they should've bringed was the C4 owner, and not the victim)

 

[dyln2000]

8 hours ago, a loaf of paper said:

clearly are not take a minute step back and take another look excluding your death.

The sit was about me. I brought him because I died for no reason. I have him a warning for RDM. This would be different if he was trying to get rid of the bomb and had people chasing him, but that's not the case. He just stood there. 

[a loaf of paper]

3 hours ago, dyln said:

The sit was about me. I brought him because I died for no reason. I have him a warning for RDM. This would be different if he was trying to get rid of the bomb and had people chasing him, but that's not the case. He just stood there. 

Did the C4 move from the original spot in the slightest yes or no because as it seems it did and there is no specific measurement for how far the C4 has to move for it to be  removed from the original position. Dyln you went after the wrong guy and I know from experience that even if you died from the C4 it would have given you the name of the guy who owned/places the C4 in the logs. You went after the wrong guy and you must have ether skipped over or didn’t read logs in general. One more point I would like to add and everyone can take this with a grain of salt but when dealing with another sit that had both you and zerotwo evolved zerotwo expressed concern  when you supposedly said something along the lines of “let’s figure out how I can get you banned”

Edited December 8, 2021 by a loaf of paper

[Guest CaptainT]

Seeing that it was consensual with the group you were with I am going to +1 for warn removal(as long as evidence is provided/or a staff member interviews players involved) It seems like unfortunate timing with Marshall5 passing by , and it is definitely something I would not have given a warn for . 

Edited December 8, 2021 by Bot #1
Forgot sumtin

[Smelly]

Like Jewann said, if marshal deliberately ran into the explosion and there is proof I am +1, if otherwise, -1.

 

It only takes one person not involved in your friend group to be killed for a sit to be called, it just so happens that a staff member was the one killed. If it had been a random player and a sit was called, it would be handled the same way as it was here.

[Raid Lord]

Denied

 

Everyone in a group can be participating but once one person who isn't part of it dies from an explosion you're at fault no matter the situation (unless the person blatantly ran tours the bomb)