Jump to content

Dan Mcstubbins

Senior Mod

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Calendar

DarkRP Server Rules

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Everything posted by Dan Mcstubbins

  1. You need to be more detailed in your appeals if you wish to be unbanned, or else this will be denied. I could consider a ban reduction, but I don't have to, because you did it intentionally.
  2. I'm gonna have to agree with slick here. Don't plant bombs in crowded areas. It'll turn out very badly for you, as you can tell. Don't plant bombs unless you are raiding or defending. -1
  3. The ban is justified. The most I would even consider is a 2 day ban reduction. Next time, properly read motd and job roles, so this doesn't happen again. -1
  4. After watching the video, I believe I am in favor of punishment for the person who initiated the voteban. both parties(you and person you were arresting), were clearly okay with it, and it seemed like he didn't try to investigate it further, just rushing to conclusions. +1
  5. You are about to get unbanned soon, but this does look like a false voteban. both parties were accepting with it, and the dude just instantly jumped to a voteban. I would suggest making this a report, in the reports section
  6. But you have no evidence to back up your claim? I don't think this will get far without it.
  7. A meth rework would be dope. I don't care about the model, but I am +1 for the rework.
  8. Dan Mcstubbins

    Ban Appeal

    I can't really trust this based off of your word alone. If you don't have the proper evidence to appeal, then you most likely will not get unbanned. I will wait for Tyz before doing my final verdict but right now, it is leaning towards a downvote.
  9. Like kilo said, no racial slurs are allowed at all on this server, so If I see someone calling someone a "ch*nk" or "b*****", then they will be punished for racism when necessary. When it comes to this appeal though, I believe that F***** is for some reason, allowed, to me used, which fucking baffles me, because it is a slur towards homosexual people, but it's not a slur specific towards this ethnicity in particular. After breaking this down, I don't think what he said is exactly racism, and if we let other people say F*****, but not this guy, just because he targeted an ethnicity with it, would be hella hypothetical. What are we gonna do? Are we gonna let people say it, or are we going to slam people for it? You can't have both. EDIT: verdict changed to neutral.
  10. A rework would definitely be better than removing them entirely. I don't think we necessarily need them removed anyway, and I don't think Sugar wants to anyway, seeing his reaction to Fuels suggestion
  11. Yeah, I agree with Walter, that you are being a little dishonest, and even then, if you are just gonna mimic people saying edgy/disgusting shit, then I don't know how comfortable I feel about this. -1
  12. Yeah I dunno about this to be honest. I saw you on yesterday and you didn't seem too bad, but alts stay banned. Sugar rarely makes exceptions, so I don't think it'll happen. Plus, you did it twice???? -1
  13. But everyone jokes about the olive exploit and piss/cum swep already.
  14. The point of an iceberg is to put common stuff on top and then put the weirdest/most covered up shit at the bottom though. Thus the purpose of an iceberg concept. That's why people say "That's just the tip of the iceberg." I guess this was more for comedy though.
  15. You forgot to put Plutori and Rigbe on there my dude. That NEEDS to be part of the iceberg.
  16. Regardless of what you think about the thread, it will make it easier for us, and the sits will go quicker for you, if you can at least consider these guidelines. I know how much people hate being in a sit, and I don't want to spend more time than I have to.
  17. This is very well said and done. Hopefully this can teach a lot of new players how to act in a sit. Dare I say, this may be pinworthy?
  18. Yeah, you definitely can't kick someone so you can get a base. I will wait for the guy that's reported to respond first though.
  19. DO NOT forget to study the staff guidelines, Sit guidelines, punishment guidelines, as well as the rules(motd). You will need all this in order to successfully answer the questions, but if you have a firm grasp of all of these, you should be alright. Though honestly, since you were involved with the king exploit incident, I am not sure if Sugar would allow you on the staff team.
  20. After viewing the evidence, I am going to have to downvote this appeal as well. Even if it was an accident or you tried to stop it, you shouldn't have had the macro set up in the first place. Regardless on whether you truly had malicious intent or not, It's not allowed. Unless more evidence or points persuade me to make q different decision, then I will remain -1
  21. I mean if your points are correct, then I guess I don't really have anything else I can say to fight this. I guess I would not mind this being added.
  22. Just propsurf in kingdom. I don't really see why we would just let anyone propsurf anyway, honestly. You can control your propsurfing more and freeze your shit in midair, so I don't really like the implications.
  23. Fuel is correct in this situation, even if you disagree. We aren't usually supposed to handle rp matters in a sit anyway. It's first up to the mayor and citizens to try to figure it out. Yes, it is FailRP, as you need a warrant but you can negotiate it all in an rp situation by simply demoting the cp via mayor. Staff would just warn or CP ban the dude anyway.
  24. You are allowed to demote for this case, but if they continue to do this then you can also choose to call a sit if needed. Handle it in rp first.
  25. Fuel was saying that you should try to handle it in game before trying to make a sit. Why is this turning into a big argument?
×
×
  • Create New...