1-800-Suicide Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 it was suppose to be a warning shot Wilmer is gonna go hard on that one, there are warn adverts and the e warn for a reason. Insert his zek advert. Pretty obvious that wasn't harassment, it maybe hurt your feelings but he wasn't harassing you by walking up to you and saying 2 sentences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Monster Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 I'm not sure if this is even relevant anymore, but I have seen on multiple occasions that both NAZ and Noahmh have gone at each other on voice and chat. I don't think Flaming is in the wrong, but I partially don't think Noahmh is in the wrong. The staff should be able to take any diss at them and shake it off with a grain of salt on their shoulders. But how Noah is changing his story in his defense reply going against 2 other people against him doesn't make since at all, it clearly shows that he abused his powers in some sort of way and should be punished for that. BUT Flaming is in the wrong because he also went up and started dissing him, but Noah was pretty salty about it, because he went through the entire map yelling, "This is fucking bullshit. I shouldn't be in trouble for this!" And when we asked about it, he would go on a rampage RDMing people. Then he would take the sit and would say that he didn't RDM them. It's really Sugar's process of thought that decides if he stays or not, but I thought I should get my opinion in the mix here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Bear Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Personal things should be solved in between you guys instead of on the forums unless it goes up to the point of harasment. Making some schlong jokes doesnt seem like harasment to me. But 3 seconds or less after E warn seems like you shouldve given more time. +1 for a strike, not demotion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter the Assaulter Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Did you tell him to stop harassing you in any way at any point in time before warning him? Is this a repeating situation for you, Noah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath- Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Whoops, I kinda dropped this failrp of him not being together with gobi that he defended (RDM x2) while we were cp raiding a base while he was a mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panduh Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Although this is the first time there is proof against Noah this time, this isn't the first time he has broken rules. From what I seen, Noah has been immature and can mess around a lot. What Wrath- posted was just a bit of it. I dont think Noah is fit to be a staff member as of currently until he proves he is worthy of the position. For now I am +1 for demotion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbak Klak Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Not something to be outright demoted over, but definitely the sort of behavior that deserves a strike. It's evident you warned for harassment only because you were upset that you were warned. I've had others complain about your behavior but have told them to report you on the forums instead of asking for details. You physgun abused me once, I have a demo of it but didn't feel the need to make a full-on report. Point is, you need to keep your behavior in check, as a staff member not only is it expected of you but it's a requirement. +1 for strike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 After reviewing evidence I have decided that I’m +1 for strike. Sorry I can’t explain why since I’m on on phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tass Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 From past offenses I think it should be a +1 for demotion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loorey Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 I Agree on that one, because of the past offenses i would also say +1 for demotion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.dd2b432ae1812ea1fd2f38a267de1517.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts