Tuss Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) I feel like it would be a good idea if warns over 16 months old still show up on !warn, but they don’t count towards the threshold to get banned. This shows the staff that they know the rules, but at the same time gives people time to change and not be afraid to play on the server. @Blue. suggested that I make a suggestions post about my idea after talking about it here I feel that my main idea has flaws to it, but I don’t really know how to improve on it. Please leave any ideas you have to make it less flawed in the comments. Edited November 17, 2020 by 15g of lasagna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slick Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Warns mean you did something wrong. The threshold for a permanent ban from warns is 50. If you manage to accumulate 50 warns, you deserve the perma ban. -1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewann Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 only +1 if there was a time when warns didn't lead to a threshold for a ban, If this is a case, warns from before this time should not count towards bans. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danutercisd Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 4 hours ago, Jewann said: only +1 if there was a time when warns didn't lead to a threshold for a ban, If this is a case, warns from before this time should not count towards bans. I agree with this point. +1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slick Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 TitsRP has been out of beta for nearing 5 years now. Looking on the bans page, there have only been a handful of bans for people reaching 50 warns. This is not as big as a problem as you make it out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shoebill Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 4 hours ago, Jewann said: only +1 if there was a time when warns didn't lead to a threshold for a ban, If this is a case, warns from before this time should not count towards bans. i agree with this, i have around 10 warns from october 2018 6 hours ago, 15g of lasagna said: I feel like it would be a good idea if warns over 16 months old still show up on !warn, but they don’t count towards the threshold to get banned. i dont like 16 months, 24 is much more reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuss Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) 38 minutes ago, Slick said: TitsRP has been out of beta for nearing 5 years now. Looking on the bans page, there have only been a handful of bans for people reaching 50 warns. This is not as big as a problem as you make it out to be. when i joined the server, i was 11. i watched a lot of people playing darkrp and thought it would be a good idea to play some myself. the people i watched play gmod were big minges, and ofc i played like them. it was really only after i realized how fun tits is in general compared to other servers that i stopped being a hardcore minge. i got around 20-30 warns or smth close to that number from that time period. i’ve mostly changed but that doesn’t change the fact that i’m close to a perm ban for warnings. it’s to the point where i fear killing someone because they’ll complain rdm because they know i’m close to being permd. ive literally told people when i rdm them on accident that if they’re gonna report me, just tell me so i can mass rdm so i don’t get a warning for rdm. id rather wait a week than wait an eternity. also what about people that are one warn away from a month ban? they come back to gmod for the first time in (insert long period of time here) and then they don’t particularly know the rules and get a warn. i’d probably be pretty pissed if i had to wait a month for something i did (insert long period of time here) Edited November 17, 2020 by 15g of lasagna last paragraph added Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuss Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 16 minutes ago, Mav Mitchell said: i dont like 16 months, 24 is much more reasonable. that’s what i meant when i said i feel like my original idea was flawed. i don’t how long is long enough. i just really put 16 months as a placeholder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuss Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) slick, you gave me a couple warns years ago when i was still a minge. you and i had a big beef or smth stupid iirc. Edited November 17, 2020 by 15g of lasagna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexios Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 +1, I have 44 warns (an accomplishment) from when I was 12, this was 3 years ago nearing 4. I don't want to live with the sins of a 12 year old hormonal child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now