you being less active doesnt mean that the server is dying. the server has actually been popping a lot more as far as i know and is quite fun.
as for ur survey some of the statements are incredibly weirdly phrased. ''do you think you should have to wait ur turn to raid". I personally wish it didnt have to be like this, but YOU and YOUR GROUP specifically abusing this to ''takeover raid'' and then ''accidently die to my own timebomb'' or ''accidently walked into their bullets'' are the entire reason this rule was put in place. If taking over raids could be added without any form of counter raid takeovers then i'd be down, but unfortunately your group heavily abused this so it had to be lost to prevent that.
as for the raid district question it seems to be written as if you didnt understand the current rule.
why would we ban ''problematic people'' if there is no sufficient evidence put against them? if this were the case we would permanently ban terry, not because of any rulebreaks, but because he raids people too much. See how ridiculous it is to ban ''problematic people'' without an air tight case? So many people want terry banned BECAUSE he raids them, not because he is a supervillain who breaks every single rule, and if we just listened to them we'd be banning a player for doing nothing wrong and literally just being good at an aspect of the server (raiding).
As for the 2nd half, not sure what you mean and i would appreciate you to provide examples of this instead of just talking without anything to back it up, maybe we can have a discussion about that and the staff that you believe are involved in witch hunting people not because they are breaking rules but because they are ''problematic'' (are u referring to haze or something?)