Blacnova Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Just wanna add 2 things 1. you said that was your first time basing there but I witnessed you base there on multiple occasions and had around 3 reports come in about it of people complaining you're blocking off the NPC and 2. you said I only reported you because you blew my stuff up but no, I reported you because you were loopholing your own rules, and that's why Sugar gave you a strike for it. No hate towards you, just wanna clear things up. This is 100% false and I will swear under the oath of all that I've never based there, at least as I can recall in the past 2-3 months. I do apologize as I know realize that basing here was wrong, I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 ^ I think the reason he's upset is because you're a high up and respected rank so you should already know this. I'm not trying to speak for him but I think he just doesn't wanna see a respected admin breaking their own rules that they swore to follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-800-Suicide Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacnova Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. ^ Please just tell me if you think I've done something dumb. I try not to, but if you see that I have, just tell me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Peanut Butter Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 I guess I could have done that and continued recording if the conversation didn't go well but I don't really trust dealing with other staff in game and this is just how I staff I get all my evidence before I deal with it so that I already know of something said is false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephanie Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. I agree with this but the only thing is he should be telling us our wrongs not the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Could you edit your format in the area reasons you are reporting you are reporting to actually state the specific reason for this report? Other then the points of Blacnova has multiple complaints and breaks rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Peanut Butter Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 Could you edit your format in the area reasons you are reporting you are reporting to actually state the specific reason for this report? Other then the points of Blacnova has multiple complaints and breaks rules sure it's edited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacnova Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. I agree with this but the only thing is he should be telling us our wrongs not the other way around. Usually, I am the one correcting people, but I'm not a perfect human lol Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. I agree with this but the only thing is he should be telling us our wrongs not the other way around. Usually, I am the one correcting people, but I'm not a perfect human lol Obviously you can't block off an alleyway that 1. leads to a door to the sewers 2. has an npc there but its understandable how nlr makes for desperate measures (I've consistently raided bank managers over the past 3 days and kept track, 100% of my raids end up in some sort of nlr). My only question is if 3 staff and presumably more online someone could be on the lookout for nlring players instead of basing in an area where you shouldn't be basing. 2 wrongs do not make a right. I personally think Blacnova does not intentionally break rules, just look at how much he plays and that is an indicator that with all the common sense in the world not some slip-ups will happen. Also with the fact that lower staff members are too scared to take action because he is a big bad admin gives him a bubble where he might not think something is wrong when it is generally agreed that it is until a report goes up. My example of this is the day before the rule was changed to where you have to advert heist to raid the bank Blacnova was telling people they have to do it and no staff members brought that up when the rules were very clear, it ended up with me as respected calling it out in ooc and Blacnova acknowledging he was wrong and accordingly did not do the same thing again. I simply wish I was told instead receiving an automatic report. I agree with this but the only thing is he should be telling us our wrongs not the other way around. Usually, I am the one correcting people, but I'm not a perfect human lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 His intentions are pure and like Piklas said, Slip ups happen. I think its not clearly stated in the motd and is a fuzzy area so maybe just give this a verbal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts