Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I also did not see the hex post but if they were not directly involved then why was that report even accepted?

 

I would like to add that even though noting someone isn't a big punishment it can be considered one because people with a history will be punished harder in the future for similar actions. My recommendation is to do mute + note > warn > ban for player toxicity + note saying why. I don't see this incident as a big enough issue for any staff member to struck or demoted for but definitely a talking to, to get them in the correct direction regarding double punishments.  

Yea I gotta be real here, it's either warning or gigamuting with a note. Either or. If they have recent priors then you should probably just ban them, or gigamute them for longer, or warn them. I would personally not be ok with gigamuting and warning. That is two separate punishments.

59 minutes ago, Decent Human Being said:

I also did not see the hex post but if they were not directly involved then why was that report even accepted?

 

I would like to add that even though noting someone isn't a big punishment it can be considered one because people with a history will be punished harder in the future for similar actions. My recommendation is to do mute + note > warn > ban for player toxicity + note saying why. I don't see this incident as a big enough issue for any staff member to struck or demoted for but definitely a talking to, to get them in the correct direction regarding double punishments.  

The hex report was not fully accepted - only the aspect of false voting was punished for as any instance isn't allowed and it goes past whether or not someone is ok with it. The rest of the report was denied

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...