Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In-Game Name

Doge Skeletor

Your Steam ID

STEAM_0:0:42187375

Why were you banned or warned?

I was warned for "Rep Bombing" the user RogueDraco

Why should you be unwarned/unbanned?

My actions were not rep bombing, as the warning states, "Repeatedly repping someone's profile or posts because you do not like them is not allowed. " Unless the rule has been changed, when I was staff, rep bombing was only considered valid if either the user admits to rep bombing, or if negative repping doesn't make any sense, like if you were -1 repped on several different old posts. I only negative repped RogueDraco's most recent responses in this thread https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/17682-warned-for-necroposting/ because they were immature and I do not agree with them, Several other users also negative repped these posts, so it's clear that I'm not the only one with these thoughts.
Simply put, I did not negative rep him because I dislike him, I negative repped him because his responses were immature and stupid, warranting a crybaby emote.
I'll be happy to answer any questions anyone has.


Who warned/banned you?

RogueDraco

How long were you warned or banned for?

Permanant warning
  • uhoh 1
  • Thumb Down 1
Link to comment
https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/17685-warned-for-rep-bombing/
Share on other sites

Kdawg said what you did was rep bombing. You gave me 5 -rep in one min. You have also stated time and time again on how much you don’t like me and on pretty much everything you will -rep me. You can this up with Kdawg not me. Seems you also decided to delete the comment you made in shoutbox 

  • Thumb Down 1
1 hour ago, RougeDraco said:

Kdawg said what you did was rep bombing. You gave me 5 -rep in one min. You have also stated time and time again on how much you don’t like me and on pretty much everything you will -rep me. You can this up with Kdawg not me. Seems you also decided to delete the comment you made in shoutbox 

I did not delete the comment, that was somebody else on the staff team.

Literally rep bombing takes multiple forms. But if your only intent is to -rep someone so that they just have less rep on the forums by -repping everything theyre currently posting then it's rep bombing. Literally if you -rep something they post on the thread that's fine but if you negative rep everything they post on it then there's a problem. 

 

-1 

  • Thumb Down 1
10 minutes ago, Succ The Zucc said:

Literally rep bombing takes multiple forms. But if your only intent is to -rep someone so that they just have less rep on the forums by -repping everything theyre currently posting then it's rep bombing. Literally if you -rep something they post on the thread that's fine but if you negative rep everything they post on it then there's a problem. 

 

-1 

I crybaby'd his replies because they are crybaby worthy. If he posts 4 cringe ass replies then I'm gonna cry baby them. Other users reacted the exact same way I did, did they get warned for rep-bombing as well?

I would agree that it would be considered rep-bombing if i was indiscriminately negative repping irrelevant things, but all I did was react to indicate that I believe his replies are cringe whiny baby style.

"I will not be removing a defiantly valid warn. Next time don't comment on a thread that was clearly dead."

"I was 4 weeks later when you made a comment and that is necroposting idk what else to tell you on that "

"That's the whole point of what necorposting  is commenting on a dead thread which he did. So it is a valid warn "

"You still necroposted and that's now allowed sorry blue "

These replies are pointless, not really thought out at all, immature, and cringe. I disagree with them, is that not what the purpose of thumbs down and crybaby are for?

 

Based on what I saw I can see both sides.

I can see that it was an opinion on a appeal that the -1’s happened and that maybe he was saying he didn’t agree.
However it was almost exclusively T’wards Draco on any of his reply’s for his side of the warn

While I personally think it’s not technically RepBombing, I don’t know if it was necessary.

 

Giving that both sides have valid opinions and (in my opinion) neither of you are particularly wrong,


I am Neutral until anything major changes.

6 minutes ago, Solarfrogs said:

Based on what I saw I can see both sides.

I can see that it was an opinion on a appeal that the -1’s happened and that maybe he was saying he didn’t agree.
However it was almost exclusively T’wards Draco on any of his reply’s for his side of the warn

While I personally think it’s not technically RepBombing, I don’t know if it was necessary.

 

Giving that both sides have valid opinions and (in my opinion) neither of you are particularly wrong,


I am Neutral until anything major changes.

By the time I got to the second page, where blue made two really good points, I could not +1 as I was out of reactions, or else I would've.

 

Furthermore, what's the purpose of the crybaby emote if its not "you are cringe crybaby" Am I not allowed to call people cringe crybabies when they are being cringe crybabies?

10 minutes ago, RougeDraco said:

No matter what i say on the forums you are always -rep it. I could be agreeing with someone and you would -rep it. This time you got caught. Next time dont rep bomb 

 

-1 for warn removed 

I only -rep you because you have yet to say one thing that I agree with or don't find cringe. Many people seem to agree with me as you are constantly negative repped.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...