Claim 1 : Hitting the red thumbs down is an easy way to say I disagree without starting shit and I left the thread without saying anything, after that I got called out to reply and I did. What is more important here is the bias you are having, I only thumbs down the thread while if you look back at the replies, Abstergo, you and other staff were -reping my post. If I were really here do cause shit I would of -reped all of his replies and ones that disagree with me.
"They asked you to elaborate", why are you blatantly lying on your first claim? They haven't asked to elaborate for shit. He started with saying how negative it was and how his shit is comparable to curing cancer. Followed by his doggy staff Dan who tried to make an ironic reply without addressing me directly (which is of poor taste and looks more to me as someone trying to start drama).
The "Egotistical" thing on your first claim is so based. He has such an ego he would compare his doing to curing cancer and that I'm only a hater. For Doge Skeletor, the guy was signed on the forum 1 month ago and tries to claim he knows more than me because he's moderator which again is big ego.
Claim 2 : I will go over this quickly as again, it seems you haven't read shit and speculated hardcore. The only statement they made was attacking me and saying that I'm negative, I don't see how me thinking I am right because I follow the basic rules of debating makes me big ego. For the "I feel above you" again you take it out of context and not put what follows, it is justified to feel above someone who can't follow objective debating rules and try to do the opposite.
If the only weak point of my argument was me having an ego, I think I would take that W on all my other arguments which mattered to the actual cause and not throwing ad hominem. But sadly I doubt wanting to have a good and productive argument is equivalent to having an ego.
It doesn't matter how many good deeds he's done, if this thread is worthless I will say it and if I am wrong I will admit it. No one has yet to give a proper argument (as of yet). I argue with staff because they quoted me and speculated on my intentions by referring to my reputation and used the same "This is negative and he is doing positive" which doesn't help anything.
Claim 3 : I don't know where you took that quote from.
Yeah this is a suggestion and you will get criticism, what about it? The only thing I stated is that if you truly think someone will read this unironically you are miss understanding how people work. This isn't a kindergarten where we teach people how to commonly behave.
"People do miss behave therefor it's justified" People will continue to miss behave if it's in their nature, reading this thread is not a magical cure to any social disorder. My whole point is that MAYBE 1% of people will read this to find either loopholes or better their case on a report or ban appeal but otherwise no one is going to improve upon these. There is already a guide line for staff members but guide line for users who just came on gmod to chill is a bit over the top.
Claim 4 : Please stop speculating and saying things I did not say, thank you. "Fuck all of you it's not going to work". I don't see how you came to that conclusion? I legit gave a statement and the responses I got were personal attacks or just blatantly ignoring my argument because it's negative. I called the staff bad not because he made a thread, because their replies were childish, Dan trying to make a bad ironic joke to support his master Abstergo and other staff comes and insults my reputation to negate my point. These are BAD staff, they don't know how to properly conduct themselves or argue.
Please stop strawmaning me, I never said "They were retarded" so stop quoting this like it's something I said. It amazes me how the Staff bias works, they started to belittle me on baseless claims. If you think the "trying to move up the ladders or miss understood human beings" is belittling, than you are being dishonest. I gave 2 honest path that I thought could be justifiable and yet Abstergo hasn't addressed it either.
Stand with them if you want, you are doing as worst as them. Had many ad hominem and strawman. You're the king of fallacies right here.
You act all and mighty but this reply was a poor taste and hasn't answered the main topic.
Blue you were the one who asked me to reply, what did you expect... You can wish that people were better in sits but this thread wont help it I promise you. "somebody could read this and it can provide them with knowledge" I agree with you only because I know people (if this thread becomes official) will use it to find loopholes and better their case in reports or ban appeal like I stated above. Otherwise NO ONE will have their mind opened by a random ass thread. Be realistic, you guys respect his effort, good, but be honest when it comes to usefulness. This is why the staff team is in such a mess, they all want to agree with each other and if they don't, they either don't reply to the thread or worst they give out a dishonest opinion.
I am not giving too much credit to people, I know people act like monkeys in sits but they do it either because they don't care or because they are trolling (or has some kind of social disorder).
That's my whole point, it will NOT make it easier as no one or less than 1% will read this and even then it's not gonna get the result wanted. "If you at least consider these guidelines" nope, no one will consider them unironically. If you have evidence of the contrary go ahead. Yall are wishful thinking af
FK used fake quotes and then addressed them (strawman)
Says I have a big ego, because I said "I am above you" (taking out of context) I am above them in debating because they lack arguing skill.
Said it might be used (the suggestion) by some people (without evidence to support it) and that some people do it unintentionally (which I addressed as lack of courtesy) (Doubt a titsrp thread is going to cure a social disorder)
Thinks arguing is a brute force method to change someones mind in which case he thinks is negative.
Thinks that me using logical argument is calling them retarded