Report on Piklas.

[Scoredd]

Your Steam Name: Scoredd

 

 

Your ingame name: Scored

 

Your Steam Profile/SteamID: http://steamcommunity.com/id/scoredd

 

Who are you reporting? (Their name and profile): Piklas

 

Reasons why you are reporting: So earlier, one of our gang members went afk for about 5 minutes. In that five minutes someone noticed there were no keypads to our base. So they called a sit and Quizzical came. Quizzical then confirmed there was no keypads and a different moderator kicked the owner of the dupe. A different gang member then placed a different dupe down and sit was over. But during the sit when the owner of the dupe was kicked Piklas slipped inside and hid inside of our processors( We couldn't kill him or we'd blow everything up). He then waited until the sit was over and started killing our gang members and also blew up about twenty processors in the process (lol). I'm not positive this is breaking rules, but I feel to use the admin sit to hide in someones base in a spot they can't shoot you without destroying a ton of processors would have repercussions to a normal player. 

 

But earlier that day me and another gang member were basing in sewers. We had been in the base about 30 minutes without a single raid, the second we leave Tact and Piklas is raiding. I checked chat logs of Piklas and noticed he spectated Tact not even a minute before  they raided, which when you spectate someone you can move the spectate to anywhere you want, and what reason would he have to spectate his raiding partner who was most likely already beside him at the time? I told my gang member (Jeboris) what I seen and he PMed him saying "Why spectate?" I seen Piklas say in gang chat "he found out." Now he was also raiding someone at that time so I assume the "He found out" was about the guy they were raiding not Jeboris's question, although the question was 20 seconds before that statement in logs.. I think, although this isn't provable, is obvious what was going on and I doubt it was just an odd coincidence.

 

Evidence: 

 

https://imgur.com/a/Od8ts

https://imgur.com/a/ZgtSt

https://imgur.com/a/8V81Z

 

 

 

[Vexxy]

This is a major bad thing if piklas has been using spectate to precursor raids. 

 

This can also be a major on the offending staff member who was "stalling" them for 5 more minutes. 

 

Until Disproven

 

Major +1 For Demotion

[1-800-Suicide]

I don't have any evidnece to support my side but heres what I did in actuality

So the sit thing was that when the player was kicked I decided to go in (from the front) and assumed the sit was completely over so why not meme  around a bit, I was surprised someone blew the things up but I had thought the sit was over when the person was kicked, the 1 thing I think would be wrong here might be exploiting (?) no collided procerssors.

 

Now for the other part, I am going admit straight off the bat that it was admin abuse but only to see where tact was since i couldn't find him in the sewers when he said there was a raid, I did not do it to gain an advantage in the raid. I didn't see that pm about spectating and what i was refering to was that in the last part of my base there is a jump you have to do which the raider was failing at until he jumped up at which point i say he found out and for me and tact to stall him for 5 minutes of the remaining raid time. I was talking to tact via gang chat while he was on teamspeak so yeah. Also before anyone comments on how i could know he made it is because I use a camera at the bottom of my base

 

Again I don't have any evidence and what scored posted is very damming under the circumstances. I wish I had known this would come so i could shadowplay and show my side of it but this is not the case

[Maverick]

So if Piklas was the one to kick the owner of that base I'd say its bad but you are allowed to do that. The other one he owned up to it so I'd say -1 for demotion but +1 for another punishment

[Tass]

So he kicks the owner of the base for failbase which is understandable. And then some meme shit by hiding in a no collided processor (If he no collided it himself then there is a problemo, But if someone else no collided it then it isn't his fault).

Also piklas is a good staff member and I don't think he should be demoted ;-; but maybe like getting a talking to by some big boy in the sky (admeme).

 

-1 for demotion, +1 for a different punishment

---

This is a major bad thing if piklas has been using spectate to precursor raids. 

 

This can also be a major on the offending staff member who was "stalling" them for 5 more minutes. 

 

Until Disproven

 

Major +1 For Demotion

 

Oh and did you say that spectating to precursor raids and its a major +1 until disproven. Even the person in the report said that him using spectate can't be proven from what he said really unless you had eyes on him 24/7.

[Scoredd]

Technically it was proven by him saying he spectated Tact because he couldn't find the raid (The raid being our base) and in doing so you can see names through walls where he would of noticed ours were not there.

 

Also, not sure what circumstances your referring to that makes this damming.

[Mr. Peanut Butter]

As for taking advantage of staff actions to raid a base, that is something a regular player actually could do since it broadcasts staff actions to the public via chat.

 

But the spectating incident is fishy and I would say it is punishable since it is a use of a staff tool for a non-staff purpose although I personally believe Piklas used it for what they claimed to in their above statement and do not believe they would feel the need to use staff tools to assist in a raid, because I have known Piklas for a long time since before they were staff.

 

+1 for a Strike or Suspension if deemed necessary by the public.

[1-800-Suicide]

I messaged a bit about this with Doc Mcstubbins and if i were told about this or scored would've talked to me i could probably have time to shadowplay this i could have shown my actions. This doesn't make spectating anyone without a reason ok tho and my only excuse is that i  was going crazy running around the sewers like a maniac.

 

Obviously I would like to keep staffing on the server but i feel for just having the amount of reports on me that i have and even the smallest admin abuse is admin abuse some sort of punishment is due. Im not trying to play a victim card but whats right should be right.

[Scoredd]

As for taking advantage of staff actions to raid a base, that is something a regular player actually could do since it broadcasts staff actions to the public via chat.

 

But the spectating incident is fishy and I would say it is punishable since it is a use of a staff tool for a non-staff purpose although I personally believe Piklas used it for what they claimed to in their above statement and do not believe they would feel the need to use staff tools to assist in a raid, because I have known Piklas for a long time since before they were staff.

 

+1 for a Strike or Suspension if deemed necessary by the public.

 

I'd like to say the first part of what I said has nothing to do with him being staff, more of I just felt any player using an admin sit to raid would be punished but I suppose not.

 

The second part you say " I personally believe Piklas used it for what they claimed to in their above statement and do not believe they would feel the need to use staff tools to assist in a raid "

 

But he states he used it to find the raid which contradicts that statement.

[Mr. Peanut Butter]

As for taking advantage of staff actions to raid a base, that is something a regular player actually could do since it broadcasts staff actions to the public via chat.

 

But the spectating incident is fishy and I would say it is punishable since it is a use of a staff tool for a non-staff purpose although I personally believe Piklas used it for what they claimed to in their above statement and do not believe they would feel the need to use staff tools to assist in a raid, because I have known Piklas for a long time since before they were staff.

 

+1 for a Strike or Suspension if deemed necessary by the public.

 

I'd like to say the first part of what I said has nothing to do with him being staff, more of I just felt any player using an admin sit to raid would be punished but I suppose not.

 

The second part you say " I personally believe Piklas used it for what they claimed to in their above statement and do not believe they would feel the need to use staff tools to assist in a raid "

 

But he states he used it to find the raid which contradicts that statement.

 

I don't believe using it to find his friend who was at a raidable location and using it to have an advantage in the raiding process are the same thing.