Parties

[HotShot26]

I would like to say parties can not be an RP situation enough to get involved and counter here is why: So if one party member in party A starts a hit on a member in party B with this rule this puts the parties at war because they are ALL trying to counter the hit or help the hit.

 

 

OR

 

 

If A member in party A starts a PD raid the cops can arrest the other party members without them raiding the PD.

 

 

If there was a rule saying parties are not RP relations and NOT ENOUGH TO COUNTER:

 

It would enable more serious RP

It would make less player RDM reports on a party member countering

It would solve many loop holes like the ones above

It would make it more fun and seem more like role play and not get RDM'd | CALL ADMIN | REPEAT.

[Return of the Mack]

There would be no point in making a party then?

[HotShot26]

There would be no point in making a party then?

 

I do not like the concept, I would prefer to see some more RP.

[Two White Crocs]

There would be no point in making a party then?

 

 

100% Agreed, the one point of parties is to be able to do group related activities and/or protecting your friends. Getting rid of party countering would render them almost completely useless.

[TheCryptozz]

I believe that the Parties System would become irrelevant if Party Countering is removed. If it is removed, it results in more RP, yes, but it removes the purpose of having a Party overall. It would then be a System that is just taking up space if there is no point to it.

[Walter the Assaulter]

Being in a party with somebody automatically makes you involved with any situation they're in and thus are automatically countering.

So...if I kill somebody in a party, I will simply kill everybody else involved and/or countering that I see nearby.

:^)