Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, FAPGOD said:

i dont want to make it a big ole thing I'm just disappointed terrry cant handle his own dirty work and sends his many friends to harass people and I think everyone knows that  but other than that reducating terrry is good enough for me 

 

i never did anything to you 

13 minutes ago, FAPGOD said:

i dont want to make it a big ole thing I'm just disappointed terrry cant handle his own dirty work and sends his many friends to harass people and I think everyone knows that  but other than that reducating terrry is good enough for me 

 

what are you talking about 

  • Crybaby 1
On 6/1/2024 at 12:00 PM, Insurance Agent said:

image.png?ex=665c94dc&is=665b435c&hm=42f
this does not show a prior closer than 5 months ago

Awarn has thresholds for a reason it would do more in the long run to warn him for the simple rdms and let awarn take care of him for mass amounts of smaller infractions.

+1 for reduction to 3 days
-1 for unban

 

Any proof of this?

I also agree with you

+1 for reduction to 3 days
-1 for unban

While @FAPGOD is a long time player and a regular at that so he should know better, he's been doing pretty well to steer clear of trouble. @zoot is 100% right on this, the bans are outside of the month period for consideration.

 

 

On 5/31/2024 at 10:42 PM, zoot said:

"If a user has been banned previously within less than a month ago for the same punishment their ban should be increased to a longer length, there can be exceptions for serious cases."

I don't see anything that mentions 6mo as the timeframe. The history says plenty enough but 6d seems a little extreme imo.

+1 for reduction

-1 for unban.

+1 for reduction to 3 days.

Just saying he has like 8 previous bans for RDM including one I gave myself. I have gotten bans that r two times the length just because i have a history months away.image.png?ex=665f652c&is=665e13ac&hm=525acf0e1ae0799347d84db769b0abf69f7bf529b5d4177137687969f018fd75&
this is my ban date before i got banned for 2 weeks
image.png?ex=665f655c&is=665e13dc&hm=3d16ba43564ab91b572b0fbe639dc5b456ec4b7487e201d28c85a14435a861ba& 
Mainly when you have several bans/warns for the same reason staff can just use it as a basis for punishment otherwise people that only intent on mrdming would hop on every few months.

Also to me bans should always be valid as it shows a persons history, warns should be valid for the 2 and a half ish years they stay a actual punishment on a players record.

Also please just be aware of your history lol you have 48 warns/32 bans on record with a total of like 8 bans for RDM/mass not included. and a total of 38/48 warns which is a 79% rdm warn ratio.

Terrys punishment was strict but it wasn't really unjustified/mishandled.

Edited by Ember
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Ember said:

Also please just be aware of your history lol you have 48 warns/32 bans on record with a total of like 8 bans for RDM/mass not included. and a total of 38/48 warns which is a 79% rdm warn ratio.

wow just scrolled through this users ban/warn list and thought it was a glitch.. how he is not banned for longer is wild. 38 warns for rdm + multiple bans and he still does it and staff think he should only be getting 3 days? clearly he hasnt learnt his lesson from his multiple bans/warns, if anything the punishments should be getting a lot harsher to deter this, not just a 3 day ban and then another 3 day ban within the next 2 months.

i know multiple players who have been here for way more years than fapgod and havent even received half the amount of warns he has just for rdm (myself included).

serial rulebreaker. serial rdmer. dont give him a 3day he will continue (as shown before). 

give him 3 months.

top dog out

feel free to hide but i think this is pretty eye 👀 opening 🕳️

spacer.png

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...