Walter having a bad day

[1-800-Suicide]

Your Steam Name: 1-800-Suicide

Your ingame name: Piklas

Your Steam Profile/SteamID: STEAM_0:0:61391449

Why were you banned?: More than 3 fading doors and arguing my point

Why should you be unbanned?: For 1 in a real sit I am supposed to be able to argue my point of view since this in my opinion wasn't clear over the motd when also considering the fading door limit and also while i was fixing my base i was talking to walter. If he actually had the interest in a real sit wouldn't he moderate that I did what I was told instead of just banning out of no where? Easily fixable by A. actually giving me a chance to talk my point in a sit instead of saying I am spamming (which clearly I wasn't) and/or spectating or being inside the base to see I did what I was told. Wouldn't expect this from an admin to act so immaturely as to not even be able to take criticism or questioning depending on how you see it while I am also doing what I was asked to do. In evidence you can see Walter asking me to fix my base several times without even checking once as you will see in the video. If you are so power hungry that you can't even take someone questioning the rules and sources IDK whats up, I guess critical thinking isn't promoted on this server. I understand that human mistakes happen but for real how can you let your emotions take over you that much that you can't even have a conversation with someone about an inconsistency with the server and the rules. And before walter says something about it being clear that there should be only 3 fading doors if we are only looking at the rules in verbatum his statement that there can be windows too is false since it says "Fading door limit is 3 per base" which in that midset would mean that the tool called "fading door" can only be used 3 times per base, conflicting with both Walters statement and what I think his view on the rule is.

If you can't deal with doing the sit properly why spend so much energy arguing it in the first place?

Who banned you? Walter the Assaulter

Evidence:

http://prntscr.com/ivk9r6

http://prntscr.com/ivkcaf

 

http://prntscr.com/ivkcg1 they contradict each other since literally a few seconds before TheGrapeWarrior wasn't sure about it http://prntscr.com/ivkd3k

http://prntscr.com/ivkgy1 I wonder what made it into a 24 hour ban, was it the fact that I was questioning the validity of his statement while doing what I was asked?

[video=youtube]

http://prntscr.com/ivknue

 

Edit: I had no idea "Arguing with staff" was a valid thing to punish for, I know I shouldn't have done it in ooc and taken it to pms in the first place and my only excuse was that walter approached me in ooc (hindsight is 20/20) and also why would I be punished for taking an argument to PM's. I am assuming that we should just blindly agree with people we disagree with because they are higher rank. Blindly following a hierarchy has historically proven to be the best method right?

[Grape]

How did we contradict each other, I literally said you need a keypad on each side of the door, there are only 6 spawnable keypads. You can only have 3 fading doors you are able to walk through.

[Walter the Assaulter]

• Base violates rule 
  
• I tell you base violates rule
  
• You incorrectly argue base doesn't violate rule, many times in OOC
  
• I warn you to stop, you don't
  
• I mute you
  
• After being muted, in which you are not supposed to be able to communicate with any players, you begin showering me with PMs about how you are right and I am wrong and you want proof of what I say
  
• I tell you to stop, you don't
  
• 24h ban for arguing/harassment despite warnings to stop, of which you have a history of doing
  

If Sugar or Neko wants to say something, I'm open for feedback, but there's no input you can give when I'm telling you to stop doing a thing and you just don't stop doing that thing, and you know you aren't supposed to do that thing because we've been in this situation before, many times.