Miami mint vape Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 verbiage also it taken into account alot can change with , everything looks good and everything is good Link to comment https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/24520-failbase-warn-appeal/page/4/#findComment-173118 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChefSoda Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 14 minutes ago, Deltarino said: 9/10 that legal precedent doesn't work due to the fact the cop was never able to issue legal binding affirmation Where are you getting that stat? Entrapment by estoppel has been upheld as precedent in circuit courts & SCOTUS for a century and there doesn’t need to be any issuance of “legally binding affirmation”. Also that legal argument only requires as preponderance of evidence to be accepted. So you’re hypothetically is totally inaccurate: the guy who asked the cop if his vehicle was street legal would 100% get acquitted. Link to comment https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/24520-failbase-warn-appeal/page/4/#findComment-173120 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChefSoda Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 22 minutes ago, Deltarino said: verbiage also it taken into account alot can change with , everything looks good and everything is good Regardless, the fact that I asked staff to check my base proves that I had every intention of not breaking any of the rules. I asked to be ‘educated’ on the rules, I was told once I changed the material from the invisible material that it would be compliant. I should’ve been told to fix the 2 story aspect of the base when I initially reached out, at the very least I should’ve been ‘educated’ that the 2 story aspect was illegal in the verbal warning (or even the full warning) as the warn I am appealing IS technically a false warn because the aspect of my base that initially got me the warn IS compliant. Link to comment https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/24520-failbase-warn-appeal/page/4/#findComment-173121 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacnova Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) This is just a rule that was written super unclearly. You are most definitely allowed to use cover while defending a base, but you're not allowed to make your hitbox nearly impossible to hit. The warning will be removed and the rules have been updated to hopefully prevent such a situation in the future. Accepted Edited January 28 by Blacnova 1 Link to comment https://forums.titsrp.com/topic/24520-failbase-warn-appeal/page/4/#findComment-173315 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.dd2b432ae1812ea1fd2f38a267de1517.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts