Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Insurance Agent said:

he didn't delete it i hid it because its not relevant to this appeal and is just him shitposting, lets stay on track please and ignore the trolls. If your intent was to bomb the same base, same party most likely being in the same base, back to back you were in the wrong that is covered under the raid timer it is stated above multiple times by staff and you trying to go around it by saying its not clearly stateing is an attempt at Loopholeing which is not allowed either. This is not the first time a situation like this has happend. same rules discussed last month for similar sit its not something terrry came up with on the spot.

-1 You have been improving lately man even tolerable in sits, but being as toxic as you were in this appeal makes it look worse.

I dont disagree with you.  watch the video in my latest comment.  Staff on my side supporting me do this, and then all I get is shit when it comes to the forums, and when I defend myself its "toxic".  Staff need to get on the same page. 

I have no clue who said they agreed with you but there is a rule specifically saying "you cannot raid as picolas" and with you spawning one on two players you know are together makes me think you knew what you were doing + you were warned for this before aswell.  just makes me go for a -1 for warn removal (void) 

 

(edit)  I watched the video and I agree it should have been a verbal warning at the very least so Ill remain neutral on my vote

Edited by Stabby
added response
  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, Stabby said:

I have no clue who said they agreed with you but there is a rule specifically saying "you cannot raid as picolas" and with you spawning one on two players you know are together makes me think you knew what you were doing + you were warned for this before aswell.  just makes me go for a -1 for warn removal 

watch the video a few comments back in its entirety. that will explain everything you just posted. 

Just now, TapWater69 said:

A verbal would have been pretty reasonable here as this is Something you could have been educated on rather then punish you  

 

 

 

honestly we are just arguing on interpretation as it is vague.  People are telling me this and that, but what they are saying is implied, not actually written. 

23 minutes ago, TapWater69 said:

A verbal would have been pretty reasonable here as this is Something you could have been educated on rather then punish you  

 

 

 

He already has warns regarding trains, its on him for not reading the rules after that situation. 

23 minutes ago, Gennaro Anthony Sirico Jr. said:

honestly we are just arguing on interpretation as it is vague.  People are telling me this and that, but what they are saying is implied, not actually written. 

They are not saying anything implied, it clearly says in the rule that summoning a train in a base = a raid and that you need to wait 20 minutes before raiding that base again.

10 minutes ago, Terrry said:

He already has warns regarding trains, its on him for not reading the rules after that situation. 

clip shows that the train situation is clearly different. understood you cant understand that though. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...