Ban Appeal

[Easter__Egg]

Your Steam Name: Easter__Egg

Your in-game name: Easter__Egg

Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:56926135

 

Why were you warned/banned?: Lying in Sit

Why should you be unwarned/unbanned? : The person who banned me said I had admitted to lying but I never did that as well as the lying itself, they took a copy of a reply i was sending to someone else mixed with their accusation of me lying and said it was admition. I also couldn't find any type of guideline on warns/ban length against lying in a sit in the admin page on the forums, she claimed it was an immediate temp ban. [uPDATE] I just found the actual server rules and it seems there are absolutely no rules against lying in a sit, with all due respect i believe this makes my ban completely void whether I did it or not.

Who warned/banned you and for how long?: Hallow for 3 Days

Evidence: N/A

[Cunt Yeastwood]

So you get caught lying in a sit. Get clapped for it. Then come to the forums calling for a false ban without posting your full ban reason AND without evidence? My guy you know every single user can check active and past bans on the forums right? I can literally see you got banned for RDM. (https://imgur.com/a/Z7UY85f)

So first you want to lie in sits, and now we're lying on forums?? Bruh. I'll let hallow decide what to do with your dumbass. Frankly I see no reason your appeal should be accepted.

[Easter__Egg]

So you get caught lying in a sit. Get clapped for it. Then come to the forums calling for a false ban without posting your full ban reason AND without evidence? My guy you know every single user can check active and past bans on the forums right? I can literally see you got banned for RDM. (https://imgur.com/a/Z7UY85f)

So first you want to lie in sits, and now we're lying on forums?? Bruh. I'll let hallow decide what to do with your dumbass. Frankly I see no reason your appeal should be accepted.

 

sorry but that's not true at all? the original sit was for RDM, and would have just been a warn, then the lying wasn't true, she thought I admitted to lying when I had not and banned me for it. I was not trying to lie about my ban, the ban was for the so called lying and the RDM that the sit was for was questinable that's why the confusion started that caused her to think I was lying. I don't think the RDM should even be there since it was only going to be a warn before the lying topic came up. You don't need to be so rude.

---

I'm well aware that everyone can see the bans and I was not trying to lie, I 100% thought the ban was just for lying I didn't even see the RDM part of it, it wasn't a serious rdm offense either it would have been my first warn.

---

I'm well aware that everyone can see the bans and I was not trying to lie, I 100% thought the ban was just for lying I didn't even see the RDM part of it, it wasn't a serious rdm offense either it would have been my first warn.

---

I'm really just trying to get back on the server since the whole admitting to it was false and it's not even against any server rules in the first place, I don't refute any admin's decision and would completely accept the original RDM warn obviously.

---

I'm just trying to get it on official record that my "admitting to lying" was a misunderstanding because she thought I was when I was replying to something else so I can get rid of this ban

[Hallow]

To begin this, you failed to provide the entire ban reason:

 

 

 

The sit was placed on you for a single RDM (killing player Chenfu) during a revolt in which you claimed you were "protecting the mayor." To this, you claimed you were undercover. However, your job name would still have [COP] in front of it if the job was actually a cop job, regardless of being undercover or not. I checked logs myself, and you did not, in fact, have the [COP] tag. At the time of killing Chenfu, you were not a COP class (as shown by this log in this excerpt from the copied chat, going from the time I brought Chenfu to the time I banned you):

 

 

 

In regards to the miscommunication, this was cleared during the sit. I unintentionally included the portion of Chenfu's chat because it was sandwiched in between your admit. Here is the portion of the chat where you admit to lying and admitting to what:

 

 

Here is where the miscommunication happened:

 

 

In this screenshot, I copied and pasted previous chat where you said "dong" and "got me there." The miscommunication happens in-between those two messages with Chenfu's input. You believed I was referencing to that, when in reality, I was referencing to me saying your class was NOT cop, Chenfu's pasting of the death log to prove this as no [COP] tag is seen before your job name. In the last line of this screenshot, you can see my clarification of this.

 

 

In reference to "being banned for lying in a sit," this is false. You were given the maximum ban for a single RDM. I included "Lying in a sit" to justify why my choice of banning you for 3 days was more reasonable over just giving you a simple warn, which is what I was intending on doing but then you insisted on clinging to a lie.

 

 

For those wanting the complete sit chat I copied, here is the pastebin link: https://pastebin.com/2Y7xxNcA

 

 

In conclusion, given my statement here,  -1

[Easter__Egg]

You told me you were banning me for the lying in the sit, you said it was an immediate temp ban, so who's lying now. also I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to be giving the max ban for a first offense case that was even controversial

[Hallow]

You must be referencing to  line 136 on the pastebin:

[Trial Mod] Hallow: Well, you've already admitted to lying, but I will be extending that punishment to a tempban for lying

 

Like I said, a single RDM can be anywhere from a verbal to a 3 day ban. Like I also said, I was originally going to give you just a !warn for RDM, but then you insisted on lying, and the receipts are in my first reply to this thread. Like I said, I was using "Lying in a sit" for justifying why I gave you the 3 day ban instead of the warn I was going to give you. 

 

And even though it was your first offense, it is also many MRDMer's first offense when they decide to hop on and MRDM. Regardless if it was your first offense or not, you decided to lie, and got caught dead in it.

 

Punishments vary because they also take into consideration surrounding elements. The main element being you single RDMed. The surrounding element being that you lied.

[Cunt Yeastwood]

Each punishment given by a staff member is at their discression in terms of severity and legnth. 3 days for RDM and lying about it is justified. As far as "lying in a sit" not being a written rule. It's very well known on our server that a lot of basic rules fall under a 'common sense' clause, and should be expected without be expressly written. Obviously if you lie to staff, you're going to get fucked over a lot more than if you were just honest outright. Given that the banning staff isnt inclined to unban you. I will be denying your appeal in their stead.