Jump to content

Tass

VIP
  • Posts

    896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5
  • Steam ID

    76561198076421646
  • Gametracker

    Tass
  • Player Profile

    View

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

DarkRP Server Rules

Forum Rules & Guidelines

DarkRP Server Rules (Compat Test)

rules-compact-manual

Posts posted by Tass

  1. 24 minutes ago, HIDDEN said:

    i'm actually -1 to this suggestion, enchantments used to be pretty busted and I think having a few niece guns can balance the powerful ones but still be somewhat useful, for example the deals bonus damage against weird jobs is really good against annoying people using the /size because they're most likely 'weird' jobs. I agree that maybe they should be a bitt more useful however I REAAALLLY don't wanna go back to the days of getting constantly rekt because i raided a base full of people who had really op enchanted guns or I get absolutely rekt by fighting against a really powerful enchantemnt when i'm trying to defend my base with a epic or a rare

    Thats already how it is now, people just base with 5 people 4 of them outside the base all with leges with above 1k rpm. There are actually very few good enchants and the most op one I can think of was having a 1k rp gun that did 70% damage increase while standing still that already got nerfed to 20%. The actual enchants are not good the part thats broken is having at least 1k rpm and good damage you will basically dome everyone.

  2. 40 minutes ago, Fuel said:

    i mean instead of cp having to use props to build crosswalks and shit why not just make it so they are perma. or just give them more props..

    Because CP aren't required to place props as crosswalks... All you have to do is state "Cross at CORNERS/TUNNELS" and the jaywalking law is fine, people can def see the corners of a sidewalk, and no props need to be used as crosswalks...

  3. I don't think only allowing people with respected rank or people allowed to apply is a no go. I understand the problem with not having many props for an RP base but as a suggestion maybe make the business a "dual ownership" in some sorts one person can make the front area while the other makes the back. You can make 2 dupes for each section and give the dupes to them if you wanna make it yourself so it stays consistent.

    Now some problems with this:

    • Multiple characters needed to actually complete a really well done business RP base.
    • If someone has to leave you either have to leave that section empty or get someone else to place down the dupe.
    • If you get someone else to place down the dupe you have to give them the dupe first.

    All of this talk is not taking into effect people shooting your timebombs or c4 away.

     

    I don't exactly know how much basing will get a buff if props go an increase the biggest buff i can see is the increase of layers for makeshift timebombs that are being punted and more props to be trisha launcher'ed. But makeshift timebombs and c4 all have an aoe of any props inside of that aoe get either deleted or nocolided with whatever one you use. The c4 aoe is very much larger than makeshift timebombs so that raiding tool most likely wouldn't even care about the buffs. Makeshift timebomb depending on how big the base actually is can maybe increase the required makeshift timebombs by like 3-5 timebombs. Trisha launchers technically would only be affected by it taking a lot longer for them to go through all the props but most people have a way to basically have infinite trisha's.

     

    TL:DR IMO the only places this would really make a big change in raids and bases are bigger bases like if you only built the base in the bigger parts of the industrial bases as you could add more layers for makeshift timebombs but c4 wouldn't care about those props. Smaller bases wouldn't really be affected that much as the number of props you have does not directly correlate with how good the base is. A base with 45 props could very much be as good as a base with 75 props in a small enough base.

     

    If this change was to become a thing it would have to be here for at least a trial for lets say a week, time does not have to be a week, and then we re-evaluate how people think of this change and see if it is worth it to keep the change in prop limit.

     

    (If anything in all of this sounds weird I sometimes have trouble with making coherent sentences that all flow together, not because I can't speak english but because I am dumb as fuck)

  4. 1 hour ago, Abstergo McStubbins said:

    If only there was some person in charge of adding those to the server who could verify they had working hitboxes before uploading them... :swole:

    if only that person who was in charge didnt take 2 years to reply to people wanting to pay real money to the server to add those :swole:

  5. The fact that trisha's are literally one shot to remove one prop and your excuse on why it should be unblacklisted is "Trisha's are good against it".... bruh

     

    Trisha launchers also aren't "raiding meta" they are only good if you have an enchanted one that has one additional shot so you can inventory it after you shoot and rinse and repeat. They are not meta lol.

     

    Bases are completely fine without it, if you wanna try and shake up the basing meta don't find buggy ass props please.

  6. Just now, ¡TzFurry! said:

    Yeah, i assumed it was a bannable offense when it happened to me by accident

    This really isn't something to be worried about cause the amount of people who do this is so little and if you do have it recorded the person just gets banned like... patching it is just a waste of time

  7. I'm pretty sure no one on the server actually gives a shit what you do, your life is your life. Be trans, be gay, fuck a dude, fuck a dudette, fuck a traffic cone, whatever. The bottom line is if there is any sort of harassment it will be dealt with by staff (if I'm correct harassment sits or reports go straight to the admins and they deal with it, or at least should/used to). If someone calls you f** mute them fuck em they dumb as hell. If they find other ways to basically talk to you like running around with you and a text screen saying it then thats blatant harassment and will be dealt with.

     

    You can identify as a female toyota camry and I wouldn't give a single fuck about it cause you do you. We all just a bunch of retards making fun of eachother in ways.

  8. Just now, LeGerbs said:

    Wasn't trying to be an asshole per say but I just stand by the moral sticks and stones may break your bones but words can never hurt you.

    Possibly, my bad then if that's the case.

  9. 9 minutes ago, LeGerbs said:

    Are you tired of people calling you mean names? Do you feel like you're offended by every word on the planet? Are you playing on a Garry's Mod server called TitsRP? 

     

    Well we are introducing a new feature! (Its been here forever but)  its called the "mute" feature that allows you to silence those who start to test your offended level. If you're ever feeling triggered as a fully grown adult by an edgy 13 year old with just 1 click of a button they shut the fuck up! Wow fascinating! Just look at some of these product reviews!

     

    "Wow! My ass hurt so much less when I just muted them!"

     

    "I can't believe it was that easy! One click of a button and all my problems disappeared!"

     

    "After learning about this feature it changed my life for the better. I can't speak highly enough about the mute feature 6 out of 9 stars!"

    The mute feature is a thing and if a sit is made that could be an option to settle it not that hard. I don't know why you gotta be an asshole about stating a function of the game though. Reading from Dan's response to my post I'm pretty sure he is fine-ish with my suggestion. "That's why I made this post, mainly to not just advocate for restriction of the use of the word "f****t", but to also raise awareness about cases of harassment and bullying against people based on gender and sexual orientation, which I feel is often overlooked." My suggestion makes it so the word isn't instantly bannable/warnable. From my post: "if a sit is made id basically just say bring them to a sit ask if they could at least leave that talk to pms, party, gang chat, etc..." Having the person mute them so they don't see any sort of text chat or can't hear them in voice is a valid option to also let the person continue saying it to their friends in ooc.

  10. 8 minutes ago, Dan Mcstubbins said:

    Then I think we should crack down on these issues then. I said that this would be a great first step. We should also make sure that harassment of people who are LGBTQ should also be prevented and that when things like this happen, they are enforced just as well as a racism case. I didn't sign up for staff to have an easy time. I signed up for the betterment of the server and give everyone an even keel. 

     

    Yeah, I do agree with this to an extent. I don't think the use of this word should be tolerated so easily, but even if the word remains free to be said, we still need to make sure cases of harassment against people that are LGBTQ, are dealt with swiftly. That's why I made this post, mainly to not just advocate for restriction of the use of the word "f****t", but to also raise awareness about cases of harassment and bullying against people based on gender and sexual orientation, which I feel is often overlooked. 

    Yeah if people get harassed for their orientation or gender/sex and they are actually getting offended or whatever clearly there is a problem and needs to be sorted out possibly with just a verbal warning/warning/or even a ban for a little bit just to keep them away from eachother which if they keep continuing to do so then of course ban them for longer.

     

    Like as an example someone of the staff team who is a friend of mine i've called gay and probably f***** before but he just doesn't give a shit and if he does I'd stop and shit not that hard. But if on the off chance i end up continuing to do all that I should and would be banned for harassment so on and so on.

  11. Now I'm all for warning or banning people if they are actually going after people who are LGBTQ or gay with slurs to intentionally harass or bully them. Like if a female joins the server and keeps getting made fun of for their gender than we do step in tell people to stop. But I think if we were to ban or warn for these reasons staff should be have to "read the room" like was it said to be hateful towards some who it does happen to be offense to which in this case if a sit was made i believe it should be fine to tell the person who said it to stop first and if they continue to go on with other punishments. If its just two friends being bullies to eachother but someone from outside their friend group see is in ooc or and advert or something and gets offended, if a sit is made id basically just say bring them to a sit ask if they could at least leave that talk to pms, party, gang chat, etc...

     

    But you gotta remember a lot of players here play for the retardation of what is titsrp and are big "memers"

×
×
  • Create New...