HotShot26 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 I am missing one thing here: If it was NLR he had to raid, If he was in the door way, how was it a locked door that he can raid? nothing would have been set up. EVEN IF he did lock up the doors and kick him out it is not NLR because the first time the doors were NOT locked making it an uraidable public place. Unless the doors were locked (he was in the door way so this is not likely) it was not NLR. REMOVE THE WARNS! Did you get this story from Chance? Cause it was the exact story he told me. However skyty's side of the story contradicts his story(http://imgur.com/a/lMUku), and since there's not really any way for me to verify both of their claims(both of them have no evidence for the first encounter), I had to disregard it when making the final verdict That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoscher Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 I am missing one thing here: If it was NLR he had to raid, If he was in the door way, how was it a locked door that he can raid? nothing would have been set up. EVEN IF he did lock up the doors and kick him out it is not NLR because the first time the doors were NOT locked making it an uraidable public place. Unless the doors were locked (he was in the door way so this is not likely) it was not NLR. REMOVE THE WARNS! Did you get this story from Chance? Cause it was the exact story he told me. However skyty's side of the story contradicts his story(http://imgur.com/a/lMUku), and since there's not really any way for me to verify both of their claims(both of them have no evidence for the first encounter), I had to disregard it when making the final verdict That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". He pretty much was defeated and came back to revenge rdm both of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyty2134| hyplex.co Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 So Quarel you're saying to me he came back and killed me for me warning him? So isn't that revenge RDM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FadedMan Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 I am missing one thing here: If it was NLR he had to raid, If he was in the door way, how was it a locked door that he can raid? nothing would have been set up. EVEN IF he did lock up the doors and kick him out it is not NLR because the first time the doors were NOT locked making it an uraidable public place. Unless the doors were locked (he was in the door way so this is not likely) it was not NLR. REMOVE THE WARNS! Did you get this story from Chance? Cause it was the exact story he told me. However skyty's side of the story contradicts his story(http://imgur.com/a/lMUku), and since there's not really any way for me to verify both of their claims(both of them have no evidence for the first encounter), I had to disregard it when making the final verdict That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". He pretty much was defeated and came back to revenge rdm both of them. Raiding a base that they are in is not revenge rdm..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoscher Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 I am missing one thing here: If it was NLR he had to raid, If he was in the door way, how was it a locked door that he can raid? nothing would have been set up. EVEN IF he did lock up the doors and kick him out it is not NLR because the first time the doors were NOT locked making it an uraidable public place. Unless the doors were locked (he was in the door way so this is not likely) it was not NLR. REMOVE THE WARNS! Did you get this story from Chance? Cause it was the exact story he told me. However skyty's side of the story contradicts his story(http://imgur.com/a/lMUku), and since there's not really any way for me to verify both of their claims(both of them have no evidence for the first encounter), I had to disregard it when making the final verdict That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". He pretty much was defeated and came back to revenge rdm both of them. Raiding a base that they are in is not revenge rdm..... Raiding a base that they are in with an intend to kill them after you got killed 1 minute ago seems like revenge rdm to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FadedMan Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 Did you get this story from Chance? Cause it was the exact story he told me. However skyty's side of the story contradicts his story(http://imgur.com/a/lMUku), and since there's not really any way for me to verify both of their claims(both of them have no evidence for the first encounter), I had to disregard it when making the final verdict That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". He pretty much was defeated and came back to revenge rdm both of them. Raiding a base that they are in is not revenge rdm..... Raiding a base that they are in with an intend to kill them after you got killed 1 minute ago seems like revenge rdm to me. my intent was to raid. and it does not matter how long ago he killed me... nlr is only with raids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoscher Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 That still does not talk about how it was NLR, when he came back to the base he was not killed raiding, he was killing from the warning. "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". He pretty much was defeated and came back to revenge rdm both of them. Raiding a base that they are in is not revenge rdm..... Raiding a base that they are in with an intend to kill them after you got killed 1 minute ago seems like revenge rdm to me. my intent was to raid. and it does not matter how long ago he killed me... nlr is only with raids "New Life Rule does not exist in this server. What does exist is defeat". Again, NLR DOESN'T only apply to raid as Steve said in his reply early, it applies to much more things than just raids. NLR applied to you cause you were defeated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotShot26 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 The warn was for NLR, he did not NLR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoscher Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 The warn was for NLR, he did not NLR. The warn that I did was NLR l Revenge RDM. He both NLRed(for returning after he was defeated) and revenge RDMed(For killing his killer when he NLRed). I had discussed with snapshot before warning Chance and he told me to warn Chance for NLR l Revenge RDM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter the Assaulter Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 He raided. Raiding is not RDM. If he did not die while in a raid he was not defeated in a raid, raid cooldown does not apply. It is not revenge RDM if a situation was created where he would be able to kill then in approved RP fashion without it being NLR, such as beginning a new mug, beginning a raid without breaking raid cooldown raiding, etc as long as he is not breaking any rules. The real question here is can you go back into the area you died in and begin a new RP situation, completely ignoring anything that happened the last life so you aren't strictly NLRing? This is what it appears we're looking at here I've asked this question a few times and got mixed answers. I usually err on the side of "well why are you going back and harassing your killer" and that usually puts a stop to it, but is it *really* NLR? (I think so, but I'd like input.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.dd2b432ae1812ea1fd2f38a267de1517.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts