Jump to content

Report on Jo and a player


1-800-Suicide
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Your In-Game Name:

Piklas

Your Steam ID:

STEAM_0:0:61391449

Who are you reporting?:

SloppyJo STEAM_0:1:216267784 and Crown Prince of Sitland STEAM_0:1:32160514

Why are you reporting this player?:

Crown Prince of Sitland for Intentional rdm and calling me a "retard"

SloppyJo for mishandling sit and ending it prematurely

I cuffed and arrested Crown Prince valid and I told sloppy that I had video proof of it happening. After Crown prince called me a retard twice, once in a false demote then in pms he intentionally rdmed me so i reported him. When I got into the sit SloppyJo said Crown also called a sit on me so we should both drop it, I of course said no because I knew I did nothing wrong and had video proof of it. SloppyJo proceeded to question how I knew things like licenses and said falsely that I have to weapon check before arresting, I asked to be shown such a rule and SloppyJo did not ablige (because there is no rule like that) before ending the sit without me even being allowed to show the video proof that I did nothing wrong and it ended with Crown prince not being warned or banned for intentional rdm + toxicity.

I also want to add that SloppyJo said that the punishment guidelines do not say that intentional rdm is a warn or 1-3 day ban but it does, he has then proceeded to try to make fun of me saying things like "you know all the guidelines right?"

Do you have evidence related to this incident?:

Yes

SloppyJo said he was warned when he wasnt and also evidence of him trying to make fun of me


image.png?ex=6664ec48&is=66639ac8&hm=587

 

image.png?ex=6664ecc4&is=66639b44&hm=d96

 


I can also upload video of me about to type I want a different staff member when SloppyJo abruptly ends the sit.

Edited by 1-800-Suicide
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Piklas. During our time in sit, we came to the conclusion that you were clear, hence why you did not receive any warnings or punishments. With that being said, the clip of you justifying your innocence was not necessary because you weren't being punished. As Staff it is up to me to handle the situation as I see fit, and coming towards the end of the sit you decided you were going to suggest on what I need to do and how to do it. (See image) Therefore, resulting in you being returned and allowing me to handle the sitaution. The way I see it, you want your sits to go how you want and expect.

 

As for the player in question of Toxicity, he already received a 1 day ban for the toxicity after their initial warning. Upon doing so you began to make comments about the punishment in disagreement, that is when I responded. Im sorry that you feel I was making "fun" of you, but you had already given the idea that you knew the guidelines, and I all I did was reassure that.

 

vspacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

image.png?ex=6664f843&is=6663a6c3&hm=cff

Evidence of Crown prince not being warned like sloppyjo said in the chat log for the intentional rdm (like the guideline states as minimum punishment)

You can look this up yourself https://titsrp.com/dashboard/?player=76561198024586757 

The ban is for a subsequent offense of being racist and homophobic directed at me

 

Idk why sloppyjo would lie about a warn that is so easy to see was not added to this guys profile

Edited by 1-800-Suicide
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 1-800-Suicide said:

image.png?ex=6664f843&is=6663a6c3&hm=cff

Evidence of Crown prince not being warned like sloppyjo said in the chat log for the intentional rdm (like the guideline states as minimum punishment)

You can look this up yourself https://titsrp.com/dashboard/?player=76561198024586757 

The ban is for a subsequent offense of being racist and homophobic directed at me

 

Idk why sloppyjo would lie about a warn that is so easy to see was not added to this guys profile

I was derogatory towards you, never homophobic

idk why you out here lying about what I said, all I did was call you 

A. Retard
B. Shitskin

where's the homophobia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HellHound said:

I was derogatory towards you, never homophobic

idk why you out here lying about what I said, all I did was call you 

A. Retard
B. Shitskin

where's the homophobia?

The homophobia was when you called me something along the lines of "You are a shitskinned queer fuck" I did not save the log but if someone really wants to look that up they can

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1-800-Suicide said:

The homophobia was when you called me something along the lines of "You are a shitskinned queer fuck" I did not save the log but if someone really wants to look that up they can

OH right yeah. Forgot that was the full quote lmao

Anyway, Mald. 

I am however curious about @SloppyJo Not actually giving me that IRDM warn considering I told him straight out I shot you, despite the fact that, for whatever reason, in revolt you were off your cop CC and on Civ CC, you still turned blue. 

  • thumbdown -1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna be completely honest here and say that I don't care that hellhounds toxicity warns are old, he quit playing the server and then returned to act the exact same way he used to a year and a half ago. I feel, given the history (8 bans and 3 warns in a less than 8 month span in 2022) any toxicity from hellhound, especially anything this blatantly racist and homophobic should be a 2 week minimum ban. Guidelines exist for the average player, but clearly this player isn't average when it comes to how he acts.

+1 for extension to 2 weeks

As for sloppyjo I will add my thoughts later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, bugman said:

I'm gonna be completely honest here and say that I don't care that hellhounds toxicity warns are old, he quit playing the server and then returned to act the exact same way he used to a year and a half ago. I feel, given the history (8 bans and 3 warns in a less than 8 month span in 2022) any toxicity from hellhound, especially anything this blatantly racist and homophobic should be a 2 week minimum ban. Guidelines exist for the average player, but clearly this player isn't average when it comes to how he acts.

+1 for extension to 2 weeks

As for sloppyjo I will add my thoughts later

It's great when people don't know the Context of why I was toxic so let me shed some light in which Sloppy can also Attest too


Starting from the top

Went into Sit with Piklas/Suicide
Sit didn't go his way
Both of us got returned
Someone used Anon to trash on a memorial piece I have in my steam Profile of a late very close friend
I had sloppy bring me back
I asked him "Who made that last Anon Post?" 
In my tiredness, I had missed the one that Piklas had actually made and, since the timing was rather unfortunate, completely assumed it was Suicide/Piklas being toxic

Now the Issue here is, Due to me not knowing/missing that Piklas Made an Anon following it, and when I asked Sloppy about it, He stated "Piklas made the last Anon." 

So I got toxic with Piklas under the miscommunication that he was mad that the Sit didn't go his way at all. 

But yeah lets just Accuse me of being the person I was a year ago instead of inquiring for the Context of the situation

Edited by HellHound
  • thumbdown -1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, HellHound said:

It's great when people don't know the Context of why I was toxic so let me shed some light in which Sloppy can also Attest too


Starting from the top

Went into Sit with Piklas/Suicide
Sit didn't go his way
Both of us got returned
Someone used Anon to trash on a memorial piece I have in my steam Profile of a late very close friend
I had sloppy bring me back
I asked him "Who made that last Anon Post?" 
In my tiredness, I had missed the one that Piklas had actually made and, since the timing was rather unfortunate, completely assumed it was Suicide/Piklas being toxic

Now the Issue here is, Due to me not knowing/missing that Piklas Made an Anon following it, and when I asked Sloppy about it, He stated "Piklas made the last Anon." 

So I got toxic with Piklas under the miscommunication that he was mad that the Sit didn't go his way at all. 

But yeah lets just Accuse me of being the person I was a year ago instead of inquiring for the Context of the situation

"I used racial slurs and was homophobic against the wrong person" is what he is saying here to be clear.

 

 

 

also I found the exact quote + the fact that he called me those words before we were in a 2nd sit not during it like he is trying to say in this post 

image.png?ex=6665a70f&is=6664558f&hm=89b

 

Inciting incident. Completely normal and valid arrest. Let's also not forget he is skybasing in this video.

Had I been given the chance to show the staff member my proof instead of being instantly returned because he was biased against me I believe even he would be forced to see that the sit was not a both sides thing.

 

 

Edited by 1-800-Suicide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video where SloppyJo 1. says i want the sit to only go my way when i dont think i have ever been in a sit with him before (bias probably because of rumors)

2. says he decides what the guidelines say. If you pick up the context clues hes implying no punishment will be given and we should just not interact. He later contradicted himself saying crown prince was warned when he was not and he had no intention of doing so in the sit

3. he ends the sit after getting mad about the guidelines discussion before i can even ask for a different staff member due to the pretty obvious bias

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...