Enowapi Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, Wilhelm Panderino said: correct. because i knew he only called the sit to get him item back and clearly didnt want to admit that he shot me. The fact that the staff member never once asked him if what i said was true shows blatant bias towards me. The players rdm claim was automatically true whilst my claims were automatically false. This is the definition of bias 100% wrong, bias would be him seeing the clip and saying nahh you are still guilty, it isn't bias to ask to see video of your side of the claim. That isn't how this works and you've been around long enough to know that lol this isnt a game of who can get who in trouble. He called a sit and its on you to prove your side just as much as its on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilhelm Panderino Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 Just now, Enowapi said: 100% wrong, bias would be him seeing the clip and saying nahh you are still guilty, it isn't bias to ask to see video of your side of the claim. That isn't how this works and you've been around long enough to know that lol this isnt a game of who can get who in trouble. He called a sit and its on you to prove your side just as much as its on him I am gonna disagree but thats fine. Not sure about you but to me, a player repeatedly ignoring a simply yes or no question regarding the reason for the kill would stick out to me and definitely merit more investigation. Not that im surprised though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilhelm Panderino Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabroll Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) Lets see the clip already. Theres no point in commenting anything until the clip is up. The clip is the best solution to resolve this situation. yay the clip is here one thing to clarify this isnt small claims court. Onus responsibility whatever, throw that out the window. What we want is to get to the truth so everyone can move on and continue playing the game Edited February 9 by Crabroll 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enowapi Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 1 minute ago, Wilhelm Panderino said: I am gonna disagree but thats fine. Not sure about you but to me, a player repeatedly ignoring a simply yes or no question regarding the reason for the kill would stick out to me and definitely merit more investigation. Not that im surprised though. how is he supposed to get more investigation when you refuse to help tho? Step 1: He checked logs and it showed you killed him and he didnt damage you Step 2 He got both sides of your story, he said he didnt tele you, you said he did Step 3 You claimed you had video but refused to show it until the guy admitted if he did it or not theres no other "investigation" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opila Bird Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) ACCEPTED, your ban will be changed to FTC and extended to 3days Edited February 9 by bugman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilhelm Panderino Posted February 9 Author Share Posted February 9 its obvious he refused to answer my questions simply to get his item back. He knowingly called a false sit and was inherently dishonest about what happened. That item was lost due to a valid kill and the refund should be reversed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.dd2b432ae1812ea1fd2f38a267de1517.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts