YeenNico

both

IGN: YeenNico Discord: YeenNico#4146 Favorite Candy: Crunch Bars

I ditched the Christmas theme for a Halloween one.

I had a lot of fun making this. It's a tavern that's sort of like a hangout spot, complete with a bar, booths, a lounge area on the second floor, and other necessities. Check out the Christmas tree in the corner. Critique is encouraged!

It worked, thank you so much!

I've been trying to build a decent park dupe but every time I spawn props up against this wall, they become incredibly dark and not even flashlights will make them look brighter. It creates a weird, ugly contrast between literally all of the other props in my dupe and I can't find a way to fix it. Does anyone know how to fix this problem?

I haven't even done anything "socially unacceptable", all I did was question why pedophilia jokes & false accusations are bannable (rightfully so) but zoophilia jokes & false accusations which are just as bad, aren't. I personally don't think free speech should apply to pedophilia/zoophilia jokes since they're heinous- cobaselic made a really good point earlier when he said that wanting to make jokes about pedophilia and complaining about not being able to do so is incredibly weird and sus.

I changed my CC name a while ago since it was originally a joke. Also my PM isn't naked? If it was naked in the first place it wouldn't of been accepted. I just prefer playing without the clothes bodygroups because they look low-quality and retarded.

I've been unfortunate enough to know who have been doxxed and warranted IRL because trolls/retarded "antifurs" contacted their local PD and told them they were sexually abusing an animal in their care. Electronics seized, pets taken away, jobs suspended, zero income temporarily, everything gone in the blink of an eye because of one tip- zoophilia accusations are just as bad and severe as pedophilia accusations. "Mute buttons exist." Mute buttons really don't work very well if someone's going around telling everyone that you're a dog fucker/zoophile. These false, retarded accusations destroy and permanently damage reputations.

Regarding what you said earlier, being a furry isn't a "kink" or a fetish. That's retarded but that's also an entirely different argument so I have no idea why you brought it up here. Also I literally said earlier that I don't care for being made fun of for being a furry, I care about being called a dog fucker and being labeled as a zoophile simply for being a furry. It's discomforting and weird. You don't see anyone telling so-called weebs on the server to go fuck lolis simply for being weebs. "The difference between furries and people with foot fetishes is that one of them doesnt openly express their fetish and expect people to accept it and be nice." Being a furry isn't a fetish? Or a kink? It's a hobby? Don't speak on this issue if you have no idea what you are talking about, you sound like a neanderthal. "And your concept of it should be taken as seriously as pedophilia jokes is bs. Why? Because one analogy is two consenting adults doing something most consider weird as a fetish, while the other is an adult taking advantage of a non-consenting child which is disgusting. " I don't know what you're trying to say here. "One analogy is two consenting adults doing something most consider weird as a fetish", what are you even referring to? In my original post I specifically referred to zoophilia and pedophilia and why they should equally be taken seriously in regards to being bannable for making jokes/false accusations. One is an adult taking advantage of a non-consenting child, and the other is an adult taking advantage of and sexually abusing an animal. They're both equally horrible and I find it confusing as to how making jokes about one thing is bannable, understandable and rightfully so, whereas one thing isn't.

Absolutely, I one-hundred percent agree with this.

Open discussion, please don't argue! Something I've noticed on the server is that zoophile jokes & accusations aren't taken as seriously as jokes/accusations related to pedophilia. Joking about pedophilia or accusing other people of being pedophiles without proof is a bannable offense obviously, for a good reason. But regarding zoophilia, I've lost count of the amount of times I've been told that I fuck dogs, want to fuck dogs, or have been told to go fuck dogs or just be outright called a zoophile because I'm a furry. It's relatively discomforting to immediately receive that label simply because of, I dunno how to word it- identification stuff, I guess. There's people out there that automatically link being a furry to being a zoophile, but that's a whole different discussion. I'm not trying to play the victim card here but it's very uncomfortable being called a dog fucker/zoophile all the time by toxic retards. I feel like in regards to ethics and morality zoophilia and pedophilia are on the same par of things in regarding to being downright horrible and heinous, so why aren't false zoophile accusations taken as seriously as false pedo accusations? It's made me wonder- should false zoophile accusations be taken as seriously as false pedophile accusations in the sense that they're bannable? Personally I could care less about generic, retarded furry insults, but being called a zoophile/dog fucker is the only thing that genuinely makes me uncomfortable. Just wondering. I've also attached some images of someone calling me a dog fucker literally today, like twenty minutes ago so that people know I'm not some deranged schizo.