Jump to content

Doge Skeletor

VIP

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

DarkRP Server Rules

Forum Rules & Guidelines

DarkRP Server Rules (Compat Test)

rules-compact-manual

Posts posted by Doge Skeletor

  1. 39 minutes ago, Death_Shadow said:

    I have ben baned for a bad reason and the staff member that did went afk and then baned me while after freezeing me when he the guy that reported me was just calling me a lier as soon as i opend my mouth to speak and the staff member never even let me speak only at the start 

     

    Steam id: STEAM_0:1:512807105

     

    Steam if of staff: STEAM_0:1:63961575

     

    Name of staff: 

    Monkey Burger

     

    Name of player: worlder 

    hello i was the player, i deny this appeal, please be quiet

  2. As Silver touched on, un-duping your base to get ents in leaves you vulnerable to another party to raid or get partially in, etc. Getting rid of this rule makes it not only easier for basers to get ents inside their base, but it also makes it easier for observant raiders to get a good start in a raid, and from the other perspective, gives risk to removing your base even just for a few second. This rule is already abused and has no reason to be enforced (extreme pettiness) and shouldn't exist.

  3. 1 hour ago, 1-800-Suicide said:

     

    I'm not talking about a specific scenario but what you describe is obviously not ok. If you want to be pedantic the rule could be "you cannot unnecessarily body block" so your obvious extreme PTSD can be calmed.

    Technically body blocking purely to be an asshole is still covered under "DO NOT Minge" in the rules, the framework is already there, all this rule does is hamper RP and just cause more baby unneeded petty sits to be made.

  4. Bodyblocking in an abusive manner like in recent talk is so rare that it shouldn't ruin all the other valid rp (funny!) reasons for body blocking. It can easily be dealt with in rp.

    • Like 1
    • thumbdown -1 1
  5. 4 hours ago, HIDDEN said:

    bro you do realize you cannot insta kill people just because they're in your base?

     

    MOTD literally says: "KoS signs are not allowed but you may have Loitering signs. Minimum time for a loiterer to be killed is 5 seconds. Loitering signs extend to the area around the outside of a base, such as the sidewalk around it."

    ephasis on the 5 seconds part.

    you can insta kill someone because they are in your base if it isn't a public base. the KOS rule applies to area's outside bases.

  6. 38 minutes ago, The Horse said:

    yeah thats not a good reason. 

    yes it is, don't walk into open bases and you wont die

     

    serious answer: since there is no advert raid, no way to tell intention, thats why you can always kos when someone walks inside.

  7. 1. Spiderman swep is fun but is pretty crazy, probably be too op for CC use.

    2. This idea seems pretty cool, not sure how it would be coded though.

    5. CW are cool, but far too complex and too big to add to the server

    6. UI changes are nice

    7. See above

    8. No, roleplay standpoint that makes no sense.

    9. Instead of making it kick AFK players, since they boost the server anyways, just make it so that if you're inactive for x minutes, you aren't counted for things like unfun votes.

    10. No

    11. Yes, but obviously if chief is sided with CP

    12. No opinion.

    13. UI toggles I always advocate for.

    1. No, it's funny when people complain about getting KOS in an open base

    2. No, get better at not getting kidnapped

    3. This rule makes little different, only people that base in bank nowadays use legendaries and the such to defend, they will equip them on guards or on CC's all the same.

    1. No opinion.

    2. No

     

  8. 39 minutes ago, Funk Dungus said:

    Tene came back to the server and immediately began being an asshole to people again. I do not hate anyone here but I feel like this could've been handled better than this.

     

    I think the community should have a say, less than staff but still present, in ban appeals. 

    but then how will the server function when competent people get a say in ban appeals???

  9. You really dont wanna mix ram sticks, even if they're set in like |Set 1|Set 2|Set 1|Set 2, it just breaks shit, if you wanna get more ram, either upgrade your current sticks, or specifically buy the exact same model ram, with exact same speed and timings. mixing your ram will only cause you issues.

  10. 14 hours ago, Haze_of_dream said:

    I figured that since revolts exist, I'm surprised something like this doesn't exist. Essentially, a Coup d'etat for the Police would be initiated by a senior ranking Police (Ie: PD Commander, S.W.A.T Chief, Potentially Judge Gabe)

     

    When a senior ranking police initiates a vote, other senior ranking officials are given the option to participate, each person adds a 20% change that the Mayor is overthrown, If the mayor is overthrown, the initiator immediately takes his job, If he fails, the Initiator and any participating officials are immediately demoted as if they were fired from the mayor.

     

    Revolts/Unfun are done from the civilians for mayors that are too cop heavy, but a Coup d'etat would be a nice change of pace for mayors too criminally heavy. Hopefully this will encourage more mayors to be neutral and actually take all sides seriously.

    Realistically CP mains would never Coup d'etat a law heavy mayor, because CP mains are just bad people and have a weird ego thing going on.

    Only time I could see this being used is when said CP mains want to dispose of a lax law mayor to put one in whos law heavy yet again.

    No need for this suggestion, CP is fine where it is.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...